Literature DB >> 23117057

Effects of masker envelope irregularities on tone detection in narrowband and broadband noise maskers.

Emily Buss1, Joseph W Hall, John H Grose.   

Abstract

Introducing coherent masker envelope modulation to frequency regions neighboring the signal frequency can reduce detection thresholds for a pure-tone signal. Verhey and Ernst (2009) reported that irregular masker modulation conferred greater benefit than regular modulation when the masker was broadband, but that there was no difference when the masker was narrowband. The present study evaluated two possible explanations for this result: one based on modulation adaptation and the other based on the introduction of relatively long-duration modulation minima in the irregular masker modulation condition. The first experiment replicated the results of Verhey and Ernst (2009), but also included conditions in which a 12.5-ms signal was presented in a 12.5-ms modulation minimum, which was exempted from envelope jitter. The second experiment used a continuous masker and suspended jitter during epochs associated with either a 12.5- or 87.5-ms signal. No benefit of masker envelope irregularity before or after the signal was observed in either experiment. These findings are inconsistent with an explanation based on modulation adaptation, implicating instead the introduction of relatively long-duration modulation minima in the large masking release obtained for a long-duration signal in an irregularly modulated masker.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23117057      PMCID: PMC3507506          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  33 in total

1.  Auditory temporal integration and the power function model.

Authors:  G M Gerken; V K Bhat; M Hutchison-Clutter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectro-temporal integration in signal detection.

Authors:  W A van den Brink; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal integration and multiple looks.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; G H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comodulation masking release for three types of modulator as a function of modulation rate.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; S Buus; M Florentine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Comodulation masking release using SAM tonal complex maskers: effects of modulation depth and signal position.

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comodulation masking release: effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band.

Authors:  D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comodulation masking release: is comodulation sufficient?

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; P S Deliwala; W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Yi-Wen Chen; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.