OBJECTIVE: Cerebral atrophy and white matter lesions (WMLs) are common in older people with common risk factors, but it is unclear if they are related. We investigated whether and to what degree they are related in deep and superficial structures using both volumetric and visual ratings. METHODS: The intracranial, total brain tissue (TBV), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), ventricular superficial subarachnoid space (SSS), grey matter, normal-appearing white matter, WMLs, and combined CSF, venous sinuses and dural volumes were measured. WMLs were also rated using the Fazekas scale. RESULTS: Amongst 672 adults (mean age 73 ± 1 years), WMLs were associated with global brain atrophy (TBV, β = -0.43 mm(3), P < 0.01) and specifically with deep (ventricular enlargement, β = 0.10 mm(3), P = 0.03) rather than superficial (SSS, β = 0.09 mm(3), P = 0.55) atrophy. A 1 mm(3) increase in WML volume was associated with a 0.43 mm(3) decrease in TBV and 0.10 mm(3) increase in ventricular volume. WMLs were associated with combined CSF + Venous Sinuses + Meninges volumes, but not CSF volume alone. Some of the associations were attenuated after correcting for vascular risk factors. The associations were similar for visually scored WMLs. CONCLUSION: WMLs are associated with brain atrophy, primarily with deep brain structures. Measures of brain atrophy should include all intracranial structures when assessing brain shrinkage.
OBJECTIVE: Cerebral atrophy and white matter lesions (WMLs) are common in older people with common risk factors, but it is unclear if they are related. We investigated whether and to what degree they are related in deep and superficial structures using both volumetric and visual ratings. METHODS: The intracranial, total brain tissue (TBV), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), ventricular superficial subarachnoid space (SSS), grey matter, normal-appearing white matter, WMLs, and combined CSF, venous sinuses and dural volumes were measured. WMLs were also rated using the Fazekas scale. RESULTS: Amongst 672 adults (mean age 73 ± 1 years), WMLs were associated with global brain atrophy (TBV, β = -0.43 mm(3), P < 0.01) and specifically with deep (ventricular enlargement, β = 0.10 mm(3), P = 0.03) rather than superficial (SSS, β = 0.09 mm(3), P = 0.55) atrophy. A 1 mm(3) increase in WML volume was associated with a 0.43 mm(3) decrease in TBV and 0.10 mm(3) increase in ventricular volume. WMLs were associated with combined CSF + Venous Sinuses + Meninges volumes, but not CSF volume alone. Some of the associations were attenuated after correcting for vascular risk factors. The associations were similar for visually scored WMLs. CONCLUSION: WMLs are associated with brain atrophy, primarily with deep brain structures. Measures of brain atrophy should include all intracranial structures when assessing brain shrinkage.
Authors: Susan M Resnick; Dzung L Pham; Michael A Kraut; Alan B Zonderman; Christos Davatzikos Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Mark E Bastin; Maria C Valdés Hernández; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Natalie A Royle; Zoe Morris; Jonathan D Clayden; Elaine M Sandeman; Elizabeth Eadie; Catherine Murray; John M Starr; Ian J Deary Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Tom den Heijer; Mirjam I Geerlings; Freek E Hoebeek; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-01
Authors: Niels D Prins; Ewoud J van Dijk; Tom den Heijer; Sarah E Vermeer; Jellemer Jolles; Peter J Koudstaal; Albert Hofman; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Brain Date: 2005-06-09 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Maria del C Valdés Hernández; Karen J Ferguson; Francesca M Chappell; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Tullberg; E Fletcher; C DeCarli; D Mungas; B R Reed; D J Harvey; M W Weiner; H C Chui; W J Jagust Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-07-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Matthew C Evans; Josephine Barnes; Casper Nielsen; Lois G Kim; Shona L Clegg; Melanie Blair; Kelvin K Leung; Abdel Douiri; Richard G Boyes; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Omar M Al-Janabi; Pradeep Panuganti; Erin L Abner; Ahmed A Bahrani; Ronan Murphy; Shoshana H Bardach; Allison Caban-Holt; Peter T Nelson; Brian T Gold; Charles D Smith; Donna M Wilcock; Gregory A Jicha Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Mohamad Habes; Guray Erus; Jon B Toledo; Tianhao Zhang; Nick Bryan; Lenore J Launer; Yves Rosseel; Deborah Janowitz; Jimit Doshi; Sandra Van der Auwera; Bettina von Sarnowski; Katrin Hegenscheid; Norbert Hosten; Georg Homuth; Henry Völzke; Ulf Schminke; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Hans J Grabe; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Brain Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: François De Guio; Marco Duering; Franz Fazekas; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Steven M Greenberg; Leonardo Pantoni; Agnès Aghetti; Eric E Smith; Joanna Wardlaw; Eric Jouvent Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: M Del C Valdés Hernández; J Kyle; J Allan; M Allerhand; H Clark; S Muñoz Manieg; N A Royle; A J Gow; A Pattie; J Corley; M E Bastin; J M Starr; J M Wardlaw; I J Deary; E Combet Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Stuart J Ritchie; Mark E Bastin; Elliot M Tucker-Drob; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Laura E Engelhardt; Simon R Cox; Natalie A Royle; Alan J Gow; Janie Corley; Alison Pattie; Adele M Taylor; Maria Del C Valdés Hernández; John M Starr; Joanna M Wardlaw; Ian J Deary Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Emmanuel E Ntiri; Melissa F Holmes; Parisa M Forooshani; Joel Ramirez; Fuqiang Gao; Miracle Ozzoude; Sabrina Adamo; Christopher J M Scott; Dar Dowlatshahi; Jane M Lawrence-Dewar; Donna Kwan; Anthony E Lang; Sean Symons; Robert Bartha; Stephen Strother; Jean-Claude Tardif; Mario Masellis; Richard H Swartz; Alan Moody; Sandra E Black; Maged Goubran Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2021-02-01