| Literature DB >> 23114859 |
Takeshi Ogawa1, Naoyuki Ochiai, Yasumasa Nishiura, Toshikazu Tanaka, Yuki Hara.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of this new treatment for Kienböck's disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23114859 PMCID: PMC3607713 DOI: 10.1007/s00776-012-0332-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Sci ISSN: 0949-2658 Impact factor: 1.601
Fig. 1Surgical procedure. a Drilling of the lunate with our original drill guide. b Radiograph obtained when the drill guide was set. c Schema of bone marrow (BM) aspiration
Fig. 2a We transfused the bone marrow (BM) into the lunate by direct injection through the radiolucent drill guide based on our profile over the joint capsule. b Schema of the BM transfusion
Fig. 3a Setting the EF in a neutral position with mild traction of the wrist. b Schema of the EF setting and LIPUS stimulation
Summary of the clinical results
| Case | Sex | Age at operation (years) | Follow-up period (months) | Wrist pain | Grip strengtha | ROM (°) wrist extension | ROM (°) wrist flexion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | ||||
| 1 | M | 56 | 125 | Moderate | None | 90 | 85 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 40 |
| 2 | F | 66 | 58 | Moderate | None | 75 | 105 | 45 | 60 | 30 | 45 |
| 3 | F | 62 | 58 | Moderate | None | 75 | 135 | 45 | 60 | 30 | 75 |
| 4 | F | 24 | 103 | Severe | None | 130 | 125 | 70 | 65 | 60 | 60 |
| 5 | M | 68 | 84 | Severe | None | 45 | 90 | 20 | 45 | 25 | 45 |
| 6 | M | 44 | 90 | Moderate | None | 60 | 90 | 30 | 50 | 30 | 40 |
| 7 | F | 65 | 87 | Moderate | None | 65 | 85 | 30 | 45 | 35 | 40 |
| 8 | F | 19 | 21 | Moderate | Mild | 70 | 100 | 40 | 60 | 30 | 40 |
| 9 | M | 27 | 49 | Severe | None | 60 | 110 | 45 | 60 | 15 | 50 |
| 10 | F | 50 | 84 | Severe | None | 80 | 95 | 45 | 50 | 35 | 45 |
| 11 | M | 26 | 41 | Moderate | Mild | 70 | 75 | 40 | 35 | 30 | 40 |
| 12 | F | 60 | 72 | Severe | Moderate | 80 | 100 | 50 | 60 | 30 | 40 |
| 13 | M | 16 | 25 | Moderate | None | 70 | 105 | 40 | 60 | 30 | 45 |
| 14 | M | 26 | 36 | Severe | Mild | 80 | 90 | 30 | 30 | 50 | 60 |
| 15 | M | 41 | 68 | Severe | None | 110 | 115 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 55 |
| 16 | M | 53 | 65 | Moderate | None | 120 | 135 | 65 | 70 | 55 | 65 |
| 17 | M | 22 | 36 | Moderate | None | 95 | 100 | 45 | 45 | 40 | 55 |
| 18 | F | 61 | 36 | Moderate | Mild | 60 | 105 | 35 | 60 | 25 | 45 |
| Mean ± SD | 62.9 ± 28 | 77.9 ± 22 | 102.5 ± 16 | 43.0 ± 12 | 53.3 ± 10 | 36.1 ± 12 | 49.1 ± 10 | ||||
|
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | ||||||||
aThe grip strength is given as the percentage of the strength on the unaffected side
Summary of the radiologic results
| Case | Lichtman’s stage | CHR | Stahl index | Nakamura’s score | Mayo wrist score | MRI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | ||||
| 1 | IIIb | IIIb | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.20 | 0.22 | Good | Good | I |
| 2 | II | IIIa | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.43 | 0.44 | Excellent | Good | I |
| 3 | II | IIIa | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.33 | Good | Excellent | I |
| 4 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.41 | 0.40 | Good | Excellent | I |
| 5 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.33 | Good | Fair | U |
| 6 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.26 | Excellent | Excellent | I |
| 7 | II | IIIb | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.36 | 0.28 | Good | Excellent | U |
| 8 | IIIa | IIIb | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.27 | Good | Good | I |
| 9 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.24 | Good | Fair | U |
| 10 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.42 | Good | Excellent | I |
| 11 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.45 | Fair | Poor | U |
| 12 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.32 | Fair | Poor | U |
| 13 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.37 | 0.33 | Good | Fair | I |
| 14 | IIIb | IIIb | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.31 | 0.28 | Fair | Fair | U |
| 15 | II | IIIa | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.42 | Good | Excellent | I |
| 16 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.42 | 0.27 | Excellent | Excellent | I |
| 17 | IIIa | IIIa | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.33 | 0.26 | Excellent | Excellent | I |
| 18 | IIIb | IIIb | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.35 | Good | Good | U |
| Mean (and SD) | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.32 ± 0.07 | |||||
|
| 0.046 | 0.001 | |||||||
I improved, U unchanged
Fig. 4Roentgenograms and MRI for case 4. The images show that the lunate has not collapsed, and that the lunate intensity is recovered on MRI. The upper panels show anteroposterior views on the roentgenograms, the middle panels show lateral views on the roentgenograms, and the lower panels show PDW images on MRI. The preoperative images are shown on the left, together with the 1.5-, 2-, 3-, 7-, and 10-year postoperative images
Comparison of clinical and radiological results obtained with different procedures
| Source | Procedure | Follow-up period (months) | Wrist pain | Grip strength | ROM (°) wrist extension | ROM (°) wrist flexion | CHR | SI | Nakamura score (E/Gc %a) | Mayo wrist score (E/Gc %a) | MRI (improved %a) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None or mild (%a) | Post-op (%)b | Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op | Post-op | Pre-op (mean) | Post-op (mean) | Pre-op (mean) | Post-op (mean) | ||||||
| Kristensen et al. [ | Conservative | 246 | 80 (39/49) | – | – | – | – | – | – | Deformed | – | Deformed | – | – | – |
| Koh et al. [ | Radial osteotomy | 125 | 96 (24/25) | 85 | 67 % (pre-op)b; 82 % (post-op)b | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 68 (15/25) | 96 (24/25) | – | |||
| Croog and Stern [ | Proximal row carpectomy | 120 | 88 (16/18) | 88 | – | 56 | – | 49 | Radiocapitate OA 87 % | – | – | 67 (12/18) | – | ||
| Watanabe et al. [ | Radial osteotomy | 115 | 100 (13/13) | 73 | 46 | 58 | 40 | 54 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.40 | – | 50 (6/12) | – |
| Illarramendi et al. [ | Metaphyseal core decompression | 115 | 91 (20/22) | 75 | – | 59 | – | 57 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 80 (4/5) |
| Zelouf and Ruby [ | EF + cancellous bone grafting | 56 | 82 (14/17) | 81 | 53 | 54 | 52 | 59 | 0.50 | 0.49 | – | – | – | 71 (12/17) | 50 (5/10) |
| Moran et al. [ | Vascularized bone graft | 31 | 92 (24/26) | 89 | – | 50 | – | 44 | – | 0.46 | – | – | – | 46 (12/26) | 70 (12/17) |
| Afshar [ | Capitate shortening osteotomy | 12 | 100 (9/9) | Improved | – | Improved | – | Improved | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 (9/9) |
| This study | BMT + LIPUS + EF | 63 | 94 (17/18) | 102 | 43 | 53 | 36 | 49 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 83 (15/18) | 67 (12/18) | 61 (11/18) |
aImproved cases/total cases
bPercentage of the strength on the unaffected side
cExcellent or good