Literature DB >> 23114558

Slower adaptation to driving simulator and simulator sickness in older adults.

Naoko Kawano1, Kunihiro Iwamoto, Kazutoshi Ebe, Branko Aleksic, Akiko Noda, Hiroyuki Umegaki, Masafumi Kuzuya, Tetsuya Iidaka, Norio Ozaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Methods of assessing driving abilities in the elderly are urgently needed. Although the driving simulator (DS) appears to be a safe and cost-effective method of objectively evaluating driving performance, it may pose adaptation problems for elderly adults. In this study, we examined age-related adaptation deficits on the DS.
METHODS: Healthy young adults (n=15) and healthy elderly persons (n=17) completed some neuropsychological tests, and then performed a road-tracking task with the DS, which was repeated four times (Trials 1-4).
RESULTS: After simulated driving in DS, simulator sickness (SS) was observed in 18.8% of participants. The frequency of SS was 29.4% in elderly adults and 6.7% in young adults, and 17.6% of the elderly participants dropped out of the experiment. Performance on the Necker cube copying task was significantly correlated with the onset of SS. Driving performance also showed a significant interaction between group and trial, for both driving accuracy and vehicle speed. In addition, the performance of elderly adults significantly improved between trials 1 and 4, reaching a plateau in trial 4, whereas that of young adults did not change across trials.
CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence of slower adaptation to a DS-based driving task by older adults, which was associated with cognitive aging. Age affected driving accuracy and velocity when a road-tracking task was simply repeated. It is concluded that the capacity of elderly people to adapt to DS environments should be taken into consideration when evaluating their performance on DS tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23114558     DOI: 10.1007/bf03325260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  Available Virtual Reality-Based Tools for Executive Functions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesca Borgnis; Francesca Baglio; Elisa Pedroli; Federica Rossetto; Lidia Uccellatore; Jorge Alexandre Gaspar Oliveira; Giuseppe Riva; Pietro Cipresso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: Consensus Document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; John F Golding; Behrang Keshavarz; Joseph Furman; Ji-Soo Kim; Jose A Lopez-Escamez; Måns Magnusson; Bill J Yates; Ben D Lawson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

3.  Does Practicing with a Virtual Reality Driving Simulator Improve Spatial Cognition in Older Adults? A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sogol Masoumzadeh; Zahra Moussavi
Journal:  Neurosci Insights       Date:  2020-11-03

4.  Age Differences in Visual-Auditory Self-Motion Perception during a Simulated Driving Task.

Authors:  Robert Ramkhalawansingh; Behrang Keshavarz; Bruce Haycock; Saba Shahab; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-28

5.  Assessing balance through the use of a low-cost head-mounted display in older adults: a pilot study.

Authors:  Santiago J Saldana; Anthony P Marsh; W Jack Rejeski; Jack K Haberl; Peggy Wu; Scott Rosenthal; Edward H Ip
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Impact of Age-Related Vision Changes on Driving.

Authors:  Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina; Carolina Ortiz; Miriam Casares-López; José J Castro-Torres; Luis Jiménez Del Barco; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.