Literature DB >> 23114449

[Systematic assessment and improvement of medical data quality].

C O Jacke1, M Kalder, M Koller, U Wagner, U S Albert.   

Abstract

Public health research depends on empirical information that is based on data of high quality. The aim of this study was to apply the current guidelines developed by the Technology and Methodology Platform for Networked Medical Research (TMF) for the independent assessment and enhancement of data quality. A clinical register of female breast cancer patients from two periods (N = 389 of 1996-1997 and N = 488 of 2003-2004) was used. To check the plausibility, organization, and correctness of the data quality levels, data quality indicators (DQI) were chosen, operationalized, and the variance ratios of normative-analytic-defined thresholds were calculated. Significant deviations led to data improvement, which included the commonly known source data verification (SDV). A summary data quality score was calculated before and after application of the guidelines. Eleven out of 24 DQIs were tested. Data quality systematically increased from 51.6 to 67.7%. The guidelines facilitate a systematic assessment and improvement of data quality with a reasonable use of resources. This target-oriented procedure allows for a high transparency of the available data quality, which is essential for health research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23114449     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-012-1536-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  5 in total

1.  Convergence with SEER database achieved by a breast cancer network: a longitudinal benchmark of 5-year relative survival.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Ute S Albert; Iris Reinhard; Matthias Kalder
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Valid comparisons and decisions based on clinical registers and population based cohort studies: assessing the accuracy, completeness and epidemiological relevance of a breast cancer query database.

Authors:  Christian Olaf Jacke; Mathias Kalder; Uwe Wagner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-12-27

3.  The adherence paradox: guideline deviations contribute to the increased 5-year survival of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Ute S Albert; Matthias Kalder
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Validating a transnational fracture treatment registry using a standardized method.

Authors:  Jasper Frese; Annalice Gode; Gerhard Heinrichs; Armin Will; Arndt-Peter Schulz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Using relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Iris Reinhard; Ute S Albert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.