OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an exercise intervention shown to increase aerobic capacity, would also lead to less musculoskeletal pain; improved work ability, productivity, and perceived physical exertion; and less sick leave. METHODS:Sixty-seven construction workers were randomized into an exercise group training 3 × 20 minutes per week and a control group. Questionnaires and text messages were completed before and after the 12-week intervention. RESULTS: No significant changes were found in musculoskeletal pain, work ability, productivity, perceived physical exertion, and sick leave with the intervention. Questionnaires and text messages provided similar results of pain and work ability. CONCLUSIONS: Although the intervention improved aerobic capacity, it was not successful in improving musculoskeletal pain and other work-related factors. A detectable improvement presumably requires a more multifaceted intervention, larger sample size, or longer follow-up. Text messages may be a convenient data-collection method in future studies.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an exercise intervention shown to increase aerobic capacity, would also lead to less musculoskeletal pain; improved work ability, productivity, and perceived physical exertion; and less sick leave. METHODS: Sixty-seven construction workers were randomized into an exercise group training 3 × 20 minutes per week and a control group. Questionnaires and text messages were completed before and after the 12-week intervention. RESULTS: No significant changes were found in musculoskeletal pain, work ability, productivity, perceived physical exertion, and sick leave with the intervention. Questionnaires and text messages provided similar results of pain and work ability. CONCLUSIONS: Although the intervention improved aerobic capacity, it was not successful in improving musculoskeletal pain and other work-related factors. A detectable improvement presumably requires a more multifaceted intervention, larger sample size, or longer follow-up. Text messages may be a convenient data-collection method in future studies.
Authors: Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Kincaid A Lowe; Robert Herrick; Christopher Kenwood; Joshua J Gagne; Jamie F Becker; Scott P Schneider; Jack T Dennerlein; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Laura Viester; Evert A L M Verhagen; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-12-07 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Oscar E Arias; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Peter E Umukoro; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Jack T Dennerlein Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Nidhi Gupta; Christian Dyrlund Wåhlin-Jacobsen; Louise Nøhr Henriksen; Johan Simonsen Abildgaard; Karina Nielsen; Andreas Holtermann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Nidhi Gupta; Bjørn Søvsø Jensen; Karen Søgaard; Isabella Gomes Carneiro; Caroline Stordal Christiansen; Christiana Hanisch; Andreas Holtermann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lene Lehmann Moberg; Lars-Kristian Lunde; Markus Koch; Anne Therese Tveter; Kaj Bo Veiersted Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Mikkel Brandt; Kenneth Jay; Per Aagaard; Lars L Andersen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Hedwig T Stenner; Julian Eigendorf; Arno Kerling; Momme Kueck; Alexander A Hanke; Johanna Boyen; Anne-Katrin Nelius; Anette Melk; Dietmar Boethig; Christoph Bara; Andres Hilfiker; Dominik Berliner; Johann Bauersachs; Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner; Jörg Eberhard; Meike Stiesch; Cordula Schippert; Axel Haverich; Uwe Tegtbur; Sven Haufe Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 2.646