Literature DB >> 23114270

Remote ischemic conditioning: the cardiologist's perspective.

Michael R Schmidt1, Astrid D Sloth, Jacob Johnsen, Hans E Bøtker.   

Abstract

Early and successful restoration of myocardial reperfusion following an ischemic event is the most effective strategy to reduce final infarct size and improve clinical outcome. However, revascularization per se may induce further myocardial damage by myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and worsen clinical outcome. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are required to protect the myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with coronary artery disease. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) by brief nonlethal episodes of ischemia and reperfusion to an organ or tissue remote from the heart activates innate cardioprotective mechanisms. The discovery that RIC can be performed noninvasively using a blood pressure cuff on the upper arm to induce brief episodes of limb ischemia and reperfusion has facilitated the translation of RIC into the clinical arena. Whereas some trials have shown contradictory results, recently published proof-of-concept clinical studies have reported encouraging results with RIC. Large-scale multicenter clinical trials are needed to establish the role of RIC in the current clinical practice. At present, the use of RIC in acute coronary syndromes seems particularly attractive due to its potential in-ambulance application and apparent dramatic reduction in infarct size in the patients with the largest infarcts. Cardiac arrest and stroke represent ischemia-reperfusion disorders where RIC has further potential to improve outcome beyond rapid revascularization alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23114270     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328357bff2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  6 in total

1.  Protective effect of remote liver ischemic postconditioning on pulmonary ischemia and reperfusion injury in diabetic and non-diabetic rats.

Authors:  Dou Huang; Changwei Chen; Yunxia Zuo; Lei Du; Ting Liu; Geoffrey W Abbott; Zhaoyang Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Effects of Renal Ischemic Postconditioning on Myocardial Ultrastructural Organization and Myocardial Expression of Bcl-2/Bax in Rabbits.

Authors:  Wen-Zhong Zhang; Rong Li; Song Liu; Ji-Dong Zhang; Xian-Feng Ning; Shang-Lang Cai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Remote Ischemic Postconditioning Protects against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Inhibition of the RAGE-HMGB1 Pathway.

Authors:  Xiangming Wang; Junhong Wang; Tiantian Tu; Zakaria Iyan; Deeraj Mungun; Zhijian Yang; Yan Guo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Remote ischemic post-conditioning protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting the Rho-kinase signaling pathway.

Authors:  Feng Min; Xian Jie Jia; Qin Gao; Fang Niu; Zhi Yuan Hu; Ya Ling Han; Hong Jie Shi; Ying Yu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Combination of remote ischemic perconditioning and remote ischemic postconditioning fails to increase protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, compared with either alone.

Authors:  Kankai Chen; Meiling Yan; Penglong Wu; Yanwei Qing; Shuai Li; Yongguang Li; Zhifeng Dong; Hongjuan Xia; Dong Huang; Ping Xin; Jingbo Li; Meng Wei
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 6.  Enhancing and Extending Biological Performance and Resilience.

Authors:  Rehana K Leak; Edward J Calabrese; Walter J Kozumbo; Jeffrey M Gidday; Thomas E Johnson; James R Mitchell; C Keith Ozaki; Reinhard Wetzker; Aalt Bast; Regina G Belz; Hans E Bøtker; Sebastian Koch; Mark P Mattson; Roger P Simon; Randy L Jirtle; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.658

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.