Literature DB >> 23114184

Comparing the reverse Trendelenburg and horizontal position for endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Iain F Hathorn1, Al-Rahim R Habib, Jamil Manji, Amin R Javer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the 15-degree reverse Trendelenburg position (RTP) during functional endoscopic sinus surgery improves endoscopic field of view and reduces intraoperative blood loss when compared with the horizontal position (HP). STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: St Paul's Sinus Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), with or without nasal polyposis, receiving functional endoscopic sinus surgery were included. Patients were excluded if they had severe or uncontrolled hypertension and cardiovascular disease, continued use of anticoagulants, impaired coagulation, or a sinonasal tumor.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients with CRS undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) were randomized to either 15-degree RTP (experimental arm) or HP (control arm) from October 2011 to February 2012. Boezaart endoscopic field-of-view grading system was the primary outcome measure. Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) score, total blood loss, blood loss per minute, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, anesthetic technique, and surgery time were also recorded.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in mean Boezaart scoring between RTP and HP: 1.66 vs 2.33 (P < .001), with RTP producing a better endoscopic field of view. There was also a lower total blood loss and blood loss per minute with RTP (P = .01, P = .03). There was no significant difference in disease severity (P > .05), time of surgery (P > .05), or mean arterial pressure (P > .05) between the 2 surgical positions.
CONCLUSION: The 15-degree RTP improves the endoscopic field of view and reduces blood loss during FESS. We would therefore recommend its use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23114184     DOI: 10.1177/0194599812466529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  3 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 2.  Optimization of the Surgical Field in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: an Evidence-Based Approach.

Authors:  Saad Alsaleh; Jamil Manji; Amin Javer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Validation of the Modena bleeding score in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli; Luca Pingani; Francesco Maccarrone; Lukas Anschuetz; Davide Mariano; Gian Maria Galeazzi; Livio Presutti; Giulia Molinari
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.