Literature DB >> 23113597

The prognostic accuracy of resonance frequency analysis in predicting failure risk of immediately restored implants.

Momen A Atieh1, Nabeel H M Alsabeeha, Alan G T Payne, Rohana K de Silva, Donald S Schwass, Warwick J Duncan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is of imperative clinical significance to define a safe threshold for planned immediate implant restoration. The aim of this report was to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements recorded at two different times (implant placement and 8-week post-implant placement) and to determine the optimal threshold value for predicting failure risk of immediately restored/loaded implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight 8- or 9-mm-diameter implants were placed in either a fresh molar extraction socket or a healed site. An electronic RFA device was used to record the implant stability quotients (ISQs) at implant placement surgery, 8 weeks and 1 year. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to identify the optimal cut-off level. Sensitivity and specificity were also determined at the selected cut-off value.
RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve for RFA at 8 weeks was 0.93 with a significant P-value (P = 0.001). The optimum cut-off value for detecting implant stability was 60.5 ISQ measured at 8 weeks, with sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 71.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The implant stability measurements after 8 weeks showed a better accuracy in predicting implants that were at risk of failure than those taken at the time of implant placement.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Keywords:  ROC curve; dental implants; prognosis; sensitivity and specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23113597     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  8 in total

1.  A One-year Follow-up Study of a Tapered Hydrophilic Implant Design Using Various Placement Protocols in the Maxilla.

Authors:  Jakob Zwaan; Leonardo Vanden Bogaerde; Herman Sahlin; Lars Sennerby
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-12-09

2.  In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone.

Authors:  J González-Serrano; R Ortega-Aranegui; J López-Quiles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Six-implant-supported immediate fixed rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous maxillae with tilted distal implants.

Authors:  S Wentaschek; S Hartmann; C Walter; W Wagner
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-07-25

4.  Assessment of implant stability during various stages of healing placed immediately following extraction in an overdenture situation.

Authors:  Ashwin Thomas Koshy; T Aby Mathew; Nicholas Mathew; Angel Mary Joseph
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

5.  Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants.

Authors:  Peter Andersson; Luca Pagliani; Damiano Verrocchi; Stefano Volpe; Herman Sahlin; Lars Sennerby
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-04-01

6.  Primary stability of implants with peri-implant bone defects of various widths: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Yim; Hyun-Chang Lim; Ji-Youn Hong; Seung-Il Shin; Jong-Hyuk Chung; Yeek Herr; Seung-Yun Shin
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Experimental Investigation of Vibration Analysis on Implant Stability for a Novel Implant Design.

Authors:  Shouxun Lu; Benjamin Steven Vien; Matthias Russ; Mark Fitzgerald; Wing Kong Chiu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Influence of short implants geometry on primary stability.

Authors:  J González-Serrano; P Molinero-Mourelle; B Pardal-Peláez; L-M Sáez-Alcaide; R Ortega; J López-Quiles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.