Literature DB >> 23112550

Inhibition of gastric perception of mild distention by omeprazole in volunteers.

Akihito Iida1, Hiroshi Kaneko, Toshihiro Konagaya, Yasushi Funaki, Kentaro Tokudome, Shinya Izawa, Yasuhiro Tamura, Mari Mizuno, Naotaka Ogasawara, Makoto Sasaki, Kunio Kasugai.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effects of omeprazole on gastric mechanosensitivity in humans.
METHODS: A double lumen polyvinyl tube with a plastic bag was introduced into the stomach of healthy volunteers under fluorography and connected to a barostat device. Subjects were then positioned so they were sitting comfortably, and the minimal distending pressure (MDP) was determined after a 30-min adaptation period. Isobaric distensions were performed in stepwise increments of 2 mmHg (2 min each) starting from the MDP. Subjects were instructed to score feelings at the end of every step using a graphic rating scale: 0, no perception; 1, weak/vague; 2, weak but significant; 3, moderate/vague; 4, moderate but significant; 5, severe discomfort; and 6, unbearable pain. After this first test, subjects received omeprazole (20 mg, after dinner) once daily for 1 wk. A second test was performed on the last day of treatment.
RESULTS: No adverse effects were observed. Mean MDP before and after treatment was 6.3 ± 0.3 mmHg and 6.2 ± 0.5 mmHg, respectively. One subject before and 2 after treatment did not reach a score of 6 at the maximum bag volume of 750 mL. After omeprazole, there was a significant increase in the distension pressure required to reach scores of 1 (P = 0.019) and 2 (P = 0.017) as compared to baseline. There were no changes in pressure required to reach the other scores after treatment. Two subjects before and one after omeprazole rated their abdominal feeling < 1 at MDP, and mean (± SE) abdominal discomfort scores at MDP were 0.13 ± 0.09 and 0.04 ± 0.04, respectively. Mean scores induced by each MDP + 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 (mmHg) were 1.1 ± 0.3, 2.0 ± 0.4, 2.9 ± 0.5, 3.3 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.3, 5.2 ± 0.3, 5.5 ± 0.2, 5.5 ± 0.3, 5.7 ± 0.3, and 5.4, respectively. After omeprazole, abdominal feeling scores for the same incremental pressures over MDP were 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.8 ± 0.1, 2.0 ± 0.4, 2.8 ± 0.4, 3.8 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.4, 4.9 ± 0.3, 5.4 ± 0.4, 5.2 ± 0.6, and 5.0 ± 1.0, respectively. A significant decrease in feeling score was observed at intrabag pressures of MDP + 2 mmHg (P = 0.028) and + 4 mmHg (P = 0.013), respectively, after omeprazole. No significant score changes were observed at pressures ≥ MDP + 6 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: Although the precise mechanisms are undetermined, the present study demonstrated that omeprazole decreases mechanosensitivity to mild gastric distension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid exposure; Barostat test; Functional dyspepsia; Mechanosensitivity; Ome-prazole

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23112550      PMCID: PMC3482644          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

1.  Acid infusion enhances duodenal mechanosensitivity in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Magnus Simrén; Rita Vos; Jozef Janssens; Jan Tack
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 2.  Duodenal hypersensitivity to acid in patients with functional dyspepsia-pathogenesis and evaluation.

Authors:  Manabu Ishii; Hiroaki Kusunoki; Noriaki Manabe; Tomoari Kamada; Motonori Sato; Hiroshi Imamura; Akiko Shiotani; Jiro Hata; Ken Haruma
Journal:  J Smooth Muscle Res       Date:  2010

3.  Intraluminal modulation of gastric sensitivity to distension: effects of hydrochloric acid and meal.

Authors:  B Coffin; R Chollet; B Flourié; M Lémann; C Franchisseur; J C Rambaud; R Jian
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Role of chemical stimulation of the duodenum in dyspeptic symptom generation.

Authors:  O S van Boxel; J J M ter Linde; P D Siersema; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Visceral hypersensitivity and altered colonic motility after subsidence of inflammation in a rat model of colitis.

Authors:  Jun-Ho La; Tae-Wan Kim; Tae-Sik Sung; Jeoung-Woo Kang; Hyun-Ju Kim; Il-Suk Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Assessment of meal induced gastric accommodation by a satiety drinking test in health and in severe functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  J Tack; P Caenepeel; H Piessevaux; R Cuomo; J Janssens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Potential anti-inflammatory effects of proton pump inhibitors: a review and discussion of the clinical implications.

Authors:  Ramalinga R Kedika; Rhonda F Souza; Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Pathogenesis of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Kostas Mimidis; Jan Tack
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.404

9.  Gastric hypersensitivity induced by oesophageal acid infusion in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  B D J van den Elzen; G N J Tytgat; G E E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 10.  Whither dyspepsia? A historical perspective of functional dyspepsia, and concepts of pathogenesis and therapy in 2009.

Authors:  Nicholas J Talley; Rok Seon Choung
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.