AIM: To analysis the factors that predict the response to entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitis patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype C. METHODS: Fifty patients [hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative:HBeAg-positive = 26:24] with HBV genotype C, who received naïve entecavir therapy for > 2 years, were analyzed. Patients who showed HBV DNA levels ≥ 3.0 log viral copies/mL after 2 years of entecavir therapy were designated as slow-responders, while those that showed < 3.0 log copies/mL were termed rapid-responders. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels (qHBsAg) were determined by the Architect HBsAg QT immunoassay. Hepatitis B core-related antigen was detected by enzyme immunoassay. Pre-C and Core promoter mutations were determined using by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Drug-resistance mutations were detected by the PCR-Invader method. RESULTS: At year 2, HBV DNA levels in all patients in the HBeAg-negative group were < 3.0 log copies/mL. In contrast, in the HBeAg-positive group, 41.7% were slow-responders, while 58.3% were rapid-responders. No entecavir-resistant mutants were detected in the slow-responders. When the pretreatment factors were compared between the slow- and rapid-responders; the median qHBsAg in the slow-responders was 4.57 log IU/mL, compared with 3.63 log IU/mL in the rapid-responders (P < 0.01). When the pretreatment factors predictive of HBV DNA-negative status at year 2 in all 50 patients were analyzed, HBeAg-negative status, low HBV DNA levels, and low qHBsAg levels were significant (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the low qHBsAg level was the most significant predictive factor (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Quantitation of HBsAg could be a useful indicator to predict response to entecavir therapy.
AIM: To analysis the factors that predict the response to entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitispatients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype C. METHODS: Fifty patients [hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative:HBeAg-positive = 26:24] with HBV genotype C, who received naïve entecavir therapy for > 2 years, were analyzed. Patients who showed HBV DNA levels ≥ 3.0 log viral copies/mL after 2 years of entecavir therapy were designated as slow-responders, while those that showed < 3.0 log copies/mL were termed rapid-responders. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels (qHBsAg) were determined by the Architect HBsAg QT immunoassay. Hepatitis B core-related antigen was detected by enzyme immunoassay. Pre-C and Core promoter mutations were determined using by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Drug-resistance mutations were detected by the PCR-Invader method. RESULTS: At year 2, HBV DNA levels in all patients in the HBeAg-negative group were < 3.0 log copies/mL. In contrast, in the HBeAg-positive group, 41.7% were slow-responders, while 58.3% were rapid-responders. No entecavir-resistant mutants were detected in the slow-responders. When the pretreatment factors were compared between the slow- and rapid-responders; the median qHBsAg in the slow-responders was 4.57 log IU/mL, compared with 3.63 log IU/mL in the rapid-responders (P < 0.01). When the pretreatment factors predictive of HBV DNA-negative status at year 2 in all 50 patients were analyzed, HBeAg-negative status, low HBV DNA levels, and low qHBsAg levels were significant (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the low qHBsAg level was the most significant predictive factor (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Quantitation of HBsAg could be a useful indicator to predict response to entecavir therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic hepatitis B; Core promoter mutation; Entecavir; Hepatitis B core-related antigen; Hepatitis B virus genotype C; Pre-C mutation; Quantitation of hepatitis B surface antigen; Slow-responders
Authors: E Orito; M Mizokami; H Sakugawa; K Michitaka; K Ishikawa; T Ichida; T Okanoue; H Yotsuyanagi; S Iino Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Vincent Rijckborst; Bettina E Hansen; Yilmaz Cakaloglu; Peter Ferenci; Fehmi Tabak; Meral Akdogan; Krzysztof Simon; Ulus S Akarca; Robert Flisiak; Elke Verhey; Anneke J Van Vuuren; Charles A B Boucher; Martijn J ter Borg; Harry L A Janssen Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: E Orito; T Ichida; H Sakugawa; M Sata; N Horiike; K Hino; K Okita; T Okanoue; S Iino; E Tanaka; K Suzuki; H Watanabe; S Hige; M Mizokami Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jung Min Lee; Sang Hoon Ahn; Hyon Suk Kim; Hana Park; Hye Young Chang; Do Young Kim; Seong Gyu Hwang; Kyu Sung Rim; Chae Yoon Chon; Kwang-Hyub Han; Jun Yong Park Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Erik H C J Buster; Bettina E Hansen; George K K Lau; Teerha Piratvisuth; Stefan Zeuzem; Ewout W Steyerberg; Harry L A Janssen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-09-06 Impact factor: 22.682