Literature DB >> 23112214

Balanced crystalloid compared with balanced colloid solution using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.

A Feldheiser1, V Pavlova, T Bonomo, A Jones, C Fotopoulou, J Sehouli, K-D Wernecke, C Spies.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal i.v. fluids for use with a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.
METHODS: In a double-blind pilot study, we randomly assigned 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery to receive either balanced crystalloid or balanced starch (HES, 130/0.4, 6%) solutions up to the dose limit (50 ml kg(-1)). Fluids were administered to optimize stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm.
RESULTS: Baseline subject characteristics were similar in both groups. The balanced HES solution maintained stroke volume (P=0.012) better with administration of less fluid. Subjects in the colloid group reached the dose limits of the study medication less frequently (92% vs 62%, P=0.036) and later (2:26 vs 3:33 h, P=0.006) and also required less transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma units (6.0 vs 3.5 units, P=0.035) compared with the crystalloid group. Intra- and postoperative urine output and perioperative plasma levels of creatinine and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as renal injury marker were similar in both groups. No differences in the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm to optimize stroke volume, a balanced HES solution is associated with better haemodynamic stability and reduced need for fresh-frozen plasma. There were no signs of renal impairment by colloid solutions when fluid administration is targeted to optimize cardiac preload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23112214     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  37 in total

Review 1.  The History of Goal-Directed Therapy and Relevance to Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Laurie Dijoy; John Scott Dean; Carla Bistrick; Joseph J Sistino
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2015-06

2.  Clinical use of hydroxyethyl starch and serious adverse effects: Need for awareness amongst the medical fraternity.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-07

3.  Evidence-based fluid therapy.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Fluid replacement with hydroxyethyl starch in critical care--a reassessment.

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Tobias Welte; Peter Schlattmann; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  [Perioperative management for CRS and HIPEC : Anesthesiological aspects].

Authors:  D Bleiler; S Bleiler; B Sinner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Limited applications for hydroxyethyl starch : background and alternative concepts].

Authors:  M Rehm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Safety and efficacy of hydroxyethyl starch 6% 130/0.4/9 solution versus 5% human serum albumin in thoracic esophagectomy with 3-field lymph nodes dissection.

Authors:  Takeo Fujita; Naoya Okada; Yasumasa Horikiri; Takuji Sato; Hisashi Fujiwara; Shuhei Mayanagi; Jun Kanamori; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Hiroyuki Daiko
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  Kidney function after the intraoperative use of 6% tetrastarches (HES 130/0.4 and 0.42).

Authors:  Hironori Ishihara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 versus crystalloid co-loading during general anesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Takashi Juri; Koichi Suehiro; Shigemune Kuwata; Sayaka Tsujimoto; Akira Mukai; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Takashi Mori; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Resuscitation with centhaquin and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 improves survival in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock: a randomized experimental study.

Authors:  Zinais Kontouli; Chryssoula Staikou; Nicoletta Iacovidou; Ioannis Mamais; Evaggelia Kouskouni; Apostolos Papalois; Panagiotis Papapanagiotou; Anil Gulati; Athanasios Chalkias; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.