Literature DB >> 23112135

Considerations on covariates and endpoints in multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials selecting all promising treatments.

T Jaki1, D Magirr.   

Abstract

In early stages of drug development, there is often uncertainty about the most promising among a set of different treatments. To ensure the best use of resources in such situations, it is important to decide which, if any, of the treatments should be taken forward for further testing. In later development, it has been shown that evaluating more than one dose increases the chance of success substantially. In this work, we discuss how multi-arm multi-stage trials can be designed such that all promising treatments are kept in the study at the interim analyses. We first investigate the impact of deviating from the planned design and show how confidence intervals can be constructed before we consider the impact of important covariates. We show that under orthogonality, the inclusion of covariates has no effect on familywise error rate control in the strong sense. We further show that the derived methodology can be used to investigate non-normal endpoints.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23112135     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Ashley P Jones; Dannii Clayton; Gloria Nkhoma; Frances C Sherratt; Matthew Peak; Simon R Stones; Louise Roper; Bridget Young; Flora McErlane; Tracy Moitt; Athimalaipet V Ramanan; Helen E Foster; Paula R Williamson; Samundeeswari Deepak; Michael W Beresford; Eileen M Baildam
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Estimation in multi-arm two-stage trials with treatment selection and time-to-event endpoint.

Authors:  Matthias Brückner; Andrew Titman; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Factorial versus multi-arm multi-stage designs for clinical trials with multiple treatments.

Authors:  Thomas Jaki; Despina Vasileiou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Designing multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials using a risk-benefit criterion for treatment selection.

Authors:  Thomas Jaki; Lisa V Hampson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessing the feasibility of injectable growth-promoting therapy in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Mabrouka A Altowati; Ashley P Jones; Helen Hickey; Paula R Williamson; Farah M Barakat; Nicolene C Plaatjies; Ben Hardwick; Richard K Russell; Thomas Jaki; S Faisal Ahmed; Ian R Sanderson
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-12-05

6.  Type I error rates of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials: strong control and impact of intermediate outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel J Bratton; Mahesh K B Parmar; Patrick P J Phillips; Babak Choodari-Oskooei
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Design and estimation in clinical trials with subpopulation selection.

Authors:  Yi-Da Chiu; Franz Koenig; Martin Posch; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design for binary outcomes with application to tuberculosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Bratton; Patrick P J Phillips; Mahesh K B Parmar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.