Literature DB >> 23111499

DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5.

William E Narrow1, Diana E Clarke, S Janet Kuramoto, Helena C Kraemer, David J Kupfer, Lisa Greiner, Darrel A Regier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to document, in adult and pediatric patient populations, the development, descriptive statistics,and test-retest reliability of cross-cutting symptom measures proposed for inclusion in DSM-5.
METHOD: Data were collected as part of the multisite DSM-5 Field Trials in large academic settings. There were seven sites focusing on adult patients and four sites focusing on child and adolescent patients.Cross-cutting symptom measures were self-completed by the patient or an informant before the test and the retest interviews, which were conducted from 4 hours to 2 weeks apart. Clinician-report measures were completed during or after the clinical diagnostic interviews. Informants included adult patients, child patients age 11 and older, parents of all child patients age 6 and older, and legal guardians for adult patients unable to self-complete the measures. Study patients were sampled in a stratified design,and sampling weights were used in data analyses. The mean scores and standard deviations were computed and pooled across adult and child sites. Reliabilities were reported as pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: In adults, test-retest reliabilities of the cross-cutting symptom items generally were good to excellent. At the child and adolescent sites, parents were also reliablereporters of their children’s symptoms,with few exceptions. Reliabilities were not as uniformly good for child respondents, and ICCs for several items fell into the questionable range in this age group. Clinicians rated psychosis with good reliability in adult patients but were less reliable in assessing clinical domains related to psychosis in children and to suicide in all age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show promising test-retest reliability results for this group of assessments, many of which are newly developed or have not been previously tested in psychiatric populations

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23111499     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12071000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  72 in total

1.  Prevalence of Mental Health Problems and Willingness to Participate in a Mindfulness Treatment: An Examination among Veterans Injured in Combat.

Authors:  Adrian J Bravo; Katie Witkiewitz; Michelle L Kelley; Jason C Redman
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2018-11-10

2.  Barriers to implementing the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Neil Krishan Aggarwal; Andel Veronica Nicasio; Ravi DeSilva; Marit Boiler; Roberto Lewis-Fernández
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09

3.  The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes.

Authors:  Darrel A Regier; Emily A Kuhl; David J Kupfer
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 4.  Canadian Guidelines for the Assessment and Diagnosis of Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders.

Authors:  Donald Addington; Sabina Abidi; Iliana Garcia-Ortega; William G Honer; Zahinoor Ismail
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.356

5.  The True North Strong and Free? Opportunities for Improving Canadian Mental Health Care and Education by Adopting the WHO's ICD-11 Classification.

Authors:  Cary S Kogan; Sabrina Paterniti
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Establishing a common metric for self-reported anxiety: linking the MASQ, PANAS, and GAD-7 to PROMIS Anxiety.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Karon F Cook; Seung W Choi; David Cella
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-12-01

7.  DSM-5 cross-cutting symptom measures: a step towards the future of psychiatric care?

Authors:  Diana E Clarke; Emily A Kuhl
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 49.548

8.  College student mental health: An evaluation of the DSM-5 self-rated Level 1 cross-cutting symptom measure.

Authors:  Adrian J Bravo; Margo C Villarosa-Hurlocker; Matthew R Pearson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2018-08-02

9.  Rumination as a Mediator of the Associations Between Moral Injury and Mental Health Problems in Combat-Wounded Veterans.

Authors:  Adrian J Bravo; Michelle L Kelley; Richard Mason; Sarah Ehlke; Christine Vinci; Lt Jason C Redman Ret
Journal:  Traumatology (Tallahass Fla)       Date:  2019-05-16

10.  Validation of the depression item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in a three-month observational study.

Authors:  Paul A Pilkonis; Lan Yu; Nathan E Dodds; Kelly L Johnston; Catherine C Maihoefer; Suzanne M Lawrence
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.