Literature DB >> 23111176

Long-term outcomes in patients who received a corneal graft for keratoconus between 1980 and 1986.

Leslie M Niziol1, David C Musch, Brenda W Gillespie, Leah M Marcotte, Alan Sugar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the probability of allograft rejection, graft failure, and recurrent keratoconus (KC) and to assess vision-specific quality of life 20 to 25 years after corneal transplantation for KC.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Two hundred nineteen eyes of 184 subjects were identified from the Michigan Corneal Transplantation Patient Registry as receiving corneal transplantation for KC from 1980 through 1986. Current ophthalmic examinations and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire were obtained. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate the time-related probability of allograft rejection, graft failure, and KC recurrence. Cox regression was used to identify predictive factors of these outcomes. The 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores were summarized with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Follow-up was available up to 27 years after surgery (median, 10 years). Rejection occurred in 98 of 219 grafts. Most rejections occurred in the first 2 years (probability, 41%; standard error, 3%). KC recurrence was noted in 6 grafts 9 to 20 years after surgery, with a 20-year probability of 10% (standard error, 4%). Eighteen grafts failed, with a 20-year probability of 12% (standard error, 3%). Larger host trephine size, male donor gender, and nonwhite donor race were associated with increased rejection hazard. Worse astigmatism and nonwhite recipient race were associated with increased failure hazard. Twenty-eight subjects completed the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire at an average of 23 years after surgery (range, 18 to 26 years). Their mean composite score was 84.5 (standard deviation, 12.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Allograft rejection is frequent in the 2 years after corneal graft for KC. However, the 20-year probabilities of graft failure and recurrent KC are low. Given the relative youth of KC graft recipients, these statistics should enhance the information they receive.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23111176     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  12 in total

1.  Characteristics and risk factors of recurrent keratoconus over the long term after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Junko Yoshida; Hiroshi Murata; Takashi Miyai; Rika Shirakawa; Tetsuya Toyono; Satoru Yamagami; Tomohiko Usui
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Gender differences in keratoconus keratoplasty: a 25-year study in Southern Brazil and global perspective.

Authors:  Otavio A Magalhaes; Samara B Marafon; Raissa C Ferreira
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Vision-Related Quality of Life after Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Fardin Amiri; Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus: analysis of the factors associated with final visual acuities.

Authors:  Jin A Choi; Min A Lee; Man-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus eyes with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Seyed-Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion; Mohammad Abolhosseini
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-28

Review 6.  Corneal surgery in keratoconus: which type, which technique, which outcomes?

Authors:  Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-18

Review 7.  Updates on Managements for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Zahra Heidari; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-06

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Population with American Corneas.

Authors:  Fang-Chi Hsiao; Po-Yuan Chen; Yaa-Jyuhn James Meir; Hsin-Yuan Tan; Ching-Hsi Hsiao; Hsin-Chiung Lin; David Hui-Kang Ma; Lung-Kun Yeh; Wei-Chi Wu; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Keratoconus: tissue engineering and biomaterials.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karamichos; Jesper Hjortdal
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2014-09-11

10.  Descemet stripping automated endothelialkeratoplasty (DSAEK) versus repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) to manage eyes with failed corneal graft.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Khairallah
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.