Shariful Shikder1, Monjur Mourshed, Andrew Price. 1. School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. s.h.shikder@lboro.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: Research suggests that specialised lighting design is essential to cater for the elderly users of a building because of reduced visual performance with increased age. This review aims to document what is known of the physical and psychological aspects of lighting and their role in promoting a healthy and safe environment for the elderly. METHODS: A methodical review was carried out of published literature on the physical and psychological impacts of light on the elderly. Design standards and guides from professional organizations were evaluated to identify synergies and gaps between the evidence base and current practice. RESULTS: Lighting has been identified as a significant environmental attribute responsible for promoting physical and mental health of the elderly. The evidence related to visual performance was found to be robust. However, guides and standards appeared to have focused mostly on illumination requirements for specific tasks and have lacked detailed guidelines on vertical lighting and luminance design. This review has identified a growing body of evidence on the therapeutic benefits of lighting and its use in treating psychological disorders among the elderly. The experiments using light as a therapy have improved our understanding of the underlying principles, but the integration of therapeutic aspects of lighting in design practice and guidelines is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: While design guidelines discuss the physical needs of lighting for the elderly fairly well, they lack incorporation of photobiological impacts. Despite positive outcomes from research, the implementation of therapeutic aspects of lighting in buildings is still debatable due to insufficient relevant investigations and robustness of their findings. Collaborations between designers and physicians can contribute in delivering customised lighting solutions by considering disease types and needs. Further investigation needs to be carried out for translating therapeutic benefits to photometric units to implement them in building lighting design.
AIMS: Research suggests that specialised lighting design is essential to cater for the elderly users of a building because of reduced visual performance with increased age. This review aims to document what is known of the physical and psychological aspects of lighting and their role in promoting a healthy and safe environment for the elderly. METHODS: A methodical review was carried out of published literature on the physical and psychological impacts of light on the elderly. Design standards and guides from professional organizations were evaluated to identify synergies and gaps between the evidence base and current practice. RESULTS: Lighting has been identified as a significant environmental attribute responsible for promoting physical and mental health of the elderly. The evidence related to visual performance was found to be robust. However, guides and standards appeared to have focused mostly on illumination requirements for specific tasks and have lacked detailed guidelines on vertical lighting and luminance design. This review has identified a growing body of evidence on the therapeutic benefits of lighting and its use in treating psychological disorders among the elderly. The experiments using light as a therapy have improved our understanding of the underlying principles, but the integration of therapeutic aspects of lighting in design practice and guidelines is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: While design guidelines discuss the physical needs of lighting for the elderly fairly well, they lack incorporation of photobiological impacts. Despite positive outcomes from research, the implementation of therapeutic aspects of lighting in buildings is still debatable due to insufficient relevant investigations and robustness of their findings. Collaborations between designers and physicians can contribute in delivering customised lighting solutions by considering disease types and needs. Further investigation needs to be carried out for translating therapeutic benefits to photometric units to implement them in building lighting design.
Authors: Hanne Irene Jensen; Jakob Markvart; René Holst; Tina Damgaard Thomsen; Jette West Larsen; Dorthe Maria Eg; Lisa Seest Nielsen Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-04-19 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jamie Enoch; Lee Jones; Deanna J Taylor; Carol Bronze; James F Kirwan; Pete R Jones; David P Crabb Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Ingrid Goudriaan; Leonieke C van Boekel; Marjolein E A Verbiest; Joost van Hoof; Katrien G Luijkx Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Satyan R Chari; Simon Smith; Alison Mudge; Alex A Black; Mariana Figueiro; Muhtashimuddin Ahmed; Mark Devitt; Terry P Haines Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2016-01-07