Literature DB >> 23111061

A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions.

Leonard A Kaminsky1, Cemal Ozemek.   

Abstract

Prior to 2008, data collection from Actigraph accelerometers was only possible in the uniaxial mode. In 2009, Actigraph released the GT3X, which allows triaxial data collection. The purpose of this study was to determine if data collected by the GT3X in the uniaxial mode are comparable to its predecessor, the GT1M, under both standardized and free-living conditions. Thirty-four subjects (17 women and 17 men) provided complete data for this study. Subjects wore the accelerometers (one GT1M and one GT3X) on their waistband in line with the right and left anterior axillary lines. Each subject walked on a treadmill at speeds of 2.4, 3.2, 4.0, 4.8, 5.6 and 6.4 km h(-1) for 5 min each, and then continued to wear both accelerometers for all waking hours for three consecutive days. Mean steady-state activity counts min(-1) for both accelerometers were not statistically different for the standardized treadmill walking speeds and for mean minutes/day and activity counts/day for intensity classifications under the free-living condition. Based on comparisons made from both standardized walking speeds and free-living conditions, it is reasonable to compare data derived from either the GT1M or GT3X when collected in the uniaxial mode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23111061     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/11/1869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  21 in total

1.  Objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity and associations with body weight gain: does body weight determine a decline in moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity?

Authors:  U Ekelund; E Kolle; J Steene-Johannessen; K E Dalene; A K O Nilsen; S A Anderssen; B H Hansen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Physical activity in outpatients with mental disorders: status, measurement and social cognitive determinants of health behavior change.

Authors:  Moritz B Petzold; Sophie Bischoff; Janina Rogoll; Jens Plag; Christina Terán; Ralf Brand; Andreas Ströhle
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Self-reported and objectively measured physical activity in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Grace E Ahn; Joan S Chmiel; Dorothy D Dunlop; Irene B Helenowski; Pamela A Semanik; Jing Song; Barbara Ainsworth; Rowland W Chang; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Objective measurement of free-living physical activity (performance) in lumbar spinal stenosis: are physical activity guidelines being met?

Authors:  Justin Norden; Matthew Smuck; Aman Sinha; Richard Hu; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Physical activity and motor skills in children attending 43 preschools: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Line Grønholt Olesen; Peter Lund Kristensen; Mathias Ried-Larsen; Anders Grøntved; Karsten Froberg
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Influence of Day Length and Physical Activity on Sleep Patterns in Older Icelandic Men and Women.

Authors:  Robert J Brychta; Nanna Yr Arnardottir; Erlingur Johannsson; Elizabeth C Wright; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Vilmundur Gudnason; Catherine R Marinac; Megan Davis; Annemarie Koster; Paolo Caserotti; Thorarinn Sveinsson; Tamara Harris; Kong Y Chen
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Feasibility of using a compact elliptical device to increase energy expenditure during sedentary activities.

Authors:  Liza S Rovniak; LeAnn Denlinger; Ellen Duveneck; Christopher N Sciamanna; Lan Kong; Andris Freivalds; Chester A Ray
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.319

8.  Increased Walking's Additive and No Substitution Effect on Total Physical Activity.

Authors:  Bumjoon Kang; Anne V Moudon; Philip M Hurvitz; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Estimating relative intensity using individualized accelerometer cutpoints: the importance of fitness level.

Authors:  Cemal Ozemek; Heather L Cochran; Scott J Strath; Wonwoo Byun; Leonard A Kaminsky
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Physical activity in German adolescents measured by accelerometry and activity diary: introducing a comprehensive approach for data management and preliminary results.

Authors:  Rebecca Pfitzner; Lukas Gorzelniak; Joachim Heinrich; Andrea von Berg; Claudia Klümper; Carl P Bauer; Sibylle Koletzko; Dietrich Berdel; Alexander Horsch; Holger Schulz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.