Literature DB >> 23110881

Crossmodal bias of visual input on pain perception and pain-induced beta activity.

Ulrich Pomper1, Marion Höfle2, Michael Hauck3, Norbert Kathmann4, Andreas K Engel5, Daniel Senkowski2.   

Abstract

In our environment, acute pain is often accompanied by input from other sensory modalities, like visual stimuli, which can facilitate pain processing. To date, it is not well understood how these inputs influence the perception and processing of pain. Previous studies on integrative processing between sensory modalities other than pain have shown that multisensory response gains are strongest when the constituent unimodal stimuli are minimally effective in evoking responses. This finding has been termed the principle of inverse effectiveness (IE). In this high-density electroencephalography study, we investigated the influence of Gabor patches of low and high contrast levels on the perception and processing of spatially and temporally aligned painful electrical stimuli of low and high intensities. Subjective pain ratings, event-related potentials (ERPs) and oscillatory responses served as dependent measures. In line with the principle of IE, stronger crossmodal biasing effects of visual input on subjective pain ratings were found for low compared to high intensity painful stimuli. This effect was paralleled by stronger bimodal interactions in right-central ERPs (150-200ms) for low compared to high intensity pain stimuli. Moreover, an enhanced suppression of medio-central beta-band activity (12-24Hz, 200-400ms) was found for low compared to high intensity pain stimuli. Our findings possibly reflect a facilitation of stimulus processing that serves to enhance response readiness of the sensorimotor system following painful stimulation. Taken together, our study demonstrates that multisensory processing between visual and painful stimuli follows the principle of IE and suggests a role for beta-band oscillations in the crossmodal modulation of pain.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Event-related potentials; Gamma-band; Multisensory; Neural synchrony; Oscillations

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23110881     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  Interaction of auditory and pain pathways: Effects of stimulus intensity, hearing loss and opioid signaling.

Authors:  Senthilvelan Manohar; Henry J Adler; Kelly Radziwon; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Intense pain influences the cortical processing of visual stimuli projected onto the sensitized skin.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta; Emanuel N Van Den Broeke; Lieve Filbrich; Benvenuto Jacob; Julien Lambert; André Mouraux
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.926

3.  Top-down and bottom-up modulation of pain-induced oscillations.

Authors:  Michael Hauck; Claudia Domnick; Jürgen Lorenz; Christian Gerloff; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Influence of transient spatial attention on the P3 component and perception of painful and non-painful electric stimuli in crossed and uncrossed hands positions.

Authors:  Karolina Świder; Eligiusz Wronka; Joukje M Oosterman; Clementina M van Rijn; Marijtje L A Jongsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual network alterations in brain functional connectivity in chronic low back pain: A resting state functional connectivity and machine learning study.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Yiheng Tu; Randy L Gollub; Ana Ortiz; Vitaly Napadow; Siyi Yu; Georgia Wilson; Joel Park; Courtney Lang; Minyoung Jung; Jessica Gerber; Ishtiaq Mawla; Suk-Tak Chan; Ajay D Wasan; Robert R Edwards; Ted Kaptchuk; Shasha Li; Bruce Rosen; Jian Kong
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Opening a window into the riddle of misophonia, sensory over-responsiveness, and pain.

Authors:  Adi Efraim Kaufman; Irit Weissman-Fogel; M Zachary Rosenthal; Ricky Kaplan Neeman; Tami Bar-Shalita
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 7.  Understanding Monitoring Technologies for Adults With Pain: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Iyubanit Rodríguez; Valeria Herskovic; Carmen Gerea; Carolina Fuentes; Pedro O Rossel; Maíra Marques; Mauricio Campos
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Mechanical Pain Thresholds and the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Anna Bauer; Julia Hagenburger; Tina Plank; Volker Busch; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.