Literature DB >> 23110588

Australian and U.S. news media portrayal of sharks and their conservation.

Bret A Muter1, Meredith L Gore, Katie S Gledhill, Christopher Lamont, Charlie Huveneers.   

Abstract

Investigation of the social framing of human-shark interactions may provide useful strategies for integrating social, biological, and ecological knowledge into national and international policy discussions about shark conservation. One way to investigate social opinion and forces related to sharks and their conservation is through the media's coverage of sharks. We conducted a content analysis of 300 shark-related articles published in 20 major Australian and U.S. newspapers from 2000 to 2010. Shark attacks were the emphasis of over half the articles analyzed, and shark conservation was the primary topic of 11% of articles. Significantly more Australian articles than U.S. articles treated shark attacks (χ(2) = 3.862; Australian 58% vs. U.S. 47%) and shark conservation issues (χ(2) = 6.856; Australian 15% vs. U.S. 11%) as the primary article topic and used politicians as the primary risk messenger (i.e., primary person or authority sourced in the article) (χ(2) = 7.493; Australian 8% vs. U.S. 1%). However, significantly more U.S. articles than Australian articles discussed sharks as entertainment (e.g., subjects in movies, books, and television; χ(2) = 15.130; U.S. 6% vs. Australian 1%) and used scientists as the primary risk messenger (χ(2) = 5.333; U.S. 25% vs. Australian 15%). Despite evidence that many shark species are at risk of extinction, we found that most media coverage emphasized the risks sharks pose to people. To the extent that media reflects social opinion, our results highlight problems for shark conservation. We suggest that conservation professionals purposefully and frequently engage with the media to highlight the rarity of shark attacks, discuss preventative measures water users can take to reduce their vulnerability to shark encounters, and discuss conservation issues related to local and threatened species of sharks. When integrated with biological and ecological data, social-science data may help generate a more comprehensive perspective and inform conservation practice.
© 2012 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23110588     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01952.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  16 in total

Review 1.  Shark recreational fisheries: Status, challenges, and research needs.

Authors:  Austin J Gallagher; Neil Hammerschlag; Andy J Danylchuk; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Predicting potential future reduction in shark bites on people.

Authors:  Corey J A Bradshaw; Phoebe Meagher; Madeline J Thiele; Robert G Harcourt; Charlie Huveneers
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  The Effect of Background Music in Shark Documentaries on Viewers' Perceptions of Sharks.

Authors:  Andrew P Nosal; Elizabeth A Keenan; Philip A Hastings; Ayelet Gneezy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental DNA reveals tropical shark diversity in contrasting levels of anthropogenic impact.

Authors:  Judith Bakker; Owen S Wangensteen; Demian D Chapman; Germain Boussarie; Dayne Buddo; Tristan L Guttridge; Heidi Hertler; David Mouillot; Laurent Vigliola; Stefano Mariani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Attitudes and misconceptions towards sharks and shark meat consumption along the Peruvian coast.

Authors:  Rocío López de la Lama; Santiago De la Puente; Juan Carlos Riveros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analysis of the Capacity of Google Trends to Measure Interest in Conservation Topics and the Role of Online News.

Authors:  Le T P Nghiem; Sarah K Papworth; Felix K S Lim; Luis R Carrasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Data mining in conservation research using Latin and vernacular species names.

Authors:  Ivan Jarić; Franck Courchamp; Jörn Gessner; David L Roberts
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Shark Conservation: An Educational Approach Based on Children's Knowledge and Perceptions toward Sharks.

Authors:  Kwok Ho Tsoi; Sau Ying Chan; Yeung Chung Lee; Brian Ho Yeung Ip; Chi Chiu Cheang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How Close is too Close? The Effect of a Non-Lethal Electric Shark Deterrent on White Shark Behaviour.

Authors:  Ryan M Kempster; Channing A Egeberg; Nathan S Hart; Laura Ryan; Lucille Chapuis; Caroline C Kerr; Carl Schmidt; Charlie Huveneers; Enrico Gennari; Kara E Yopak; Jessica J Meeuwig; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effectiveness of five personal shark-bite deterrents for surfers.

Authors:  Charlie Huveneers; Sasha Whitmarsh; Madeline Thiele; Lauren Meyer; Andrew Fox; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.