Literature DB >> 23110510

Propofol combined with traditional sedative agents versus propofol- alone sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis.

Daorong Wang1, Sen Wang, Jie Chen, Yaxiang Xu, Chaowu Chen, Aihua Long, Zhen Zhu, Jun Liu, Denghao Deng, Juan Chen, Dong Tang, Lu Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sedation of propofol combined with traditional sedative agents (PTSA) for gastrointestinal endoscopy, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PTSA with propofol-alone sedation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: RCTs comparing the effects of PTSA and propofol alone during gastrointestinal endoscopy were found on MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE. Cardiopulmonary complications (i.e., hypoxia, hypotension, arrhythmia, and apnea), total dose of propofol used and amnesia were assessed.
RESULTS: Nine original RCTs investigating a total of 1,505 patients, of whom, 805 received PTSA sedation and 700 received propofol-alone sedation, met the inclusion criteria. Compared with propofol-alone sedation, the pooled relative risk with the use of PTSA sedation for developing hypoxia, hypotension, arrhythmias, and apnea for all the procedures combined was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.30-2.92), 1.32 (95% CI, 0.38-4.64), 2.61 (95% CI, 0.23-29.29) and 2.81 (95% CI, 0.27-29.07), with no significant difference between the groups. The pooled mean difference in total dose of propofol used was -40.01 (95% CI, -78.96 to -1.05), which showed a significant reduction with use of PTSA sedation. The pooled relative risk for amnesia was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.88-1.07), suggesting no significant difference between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: PTSA sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy could significantly reduce the total dose of propofol, but without benefits of lower risk of cardiopulmonary complications compared with propofol-alone sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23110510     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.737360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  9 in total

1.  Unsedated versus sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: a questionnaire investigation in Wuhan, central China.

Authors:  Hong-Ling Wang; Fen Ye; Wen-Fei Liao; Bing Xia; Guo-Rong Zheng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

2.  Pro: propofol in endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira; Marília Cravo
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-11-30

3.  Propofol versus midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hsiao-Chien Tsai; Yu-Cih Lin; Ching-Lung Ko; Horng-Yuan Lou; Ta-Liang Chen; Ka-Wai Tam; Chien-Yu Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Recovery of cognitive function after sedation with propofol for outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Sanath Allampati; Sijin Wen; Feiyu Liu; Justin T Kupec
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

5.  Propofol Compared to Midazolam Sedation and to General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Microwave Ablation in Patients with Hepatic Malignancies: A Single-Center Comparative Analysis of Three Historical Cohorts.

Authors:  Robbert S Puijk; Valentijn Ziedses des Plantes; Sanne Nieuwenhuizen; Alette H Ruarus; Laurien G P H Vroomen; Marcus C de Jong; Bart Geboers; Caroline J Hoedemaker-Boon; Deirdre H Thöne-Passchier; Ceylan C Gerçek; Jan J J de Vries; Petrousjka M P van den Tol; Hester J Scheffer; Martijn R Meijerink
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages.

Authors:  Jung Min Lee; Geeho Min; Bora Keum; Jae Min Lee; Seung Han Kim; Hyuk Soon Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Yeon Seok Seo; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hoon Jai Chun; Hong Sik Lee; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Cardiopulmonary safety of propofol versus midazolam/meperidine sedation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Bunyamin Gurbulak; Sinan Uzman; Esin Kabul Gurbulak; Yasar Gokhan Gul; Mehmet Toptas; Sevim Baltali; Osman Anil Savas
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  Efficacy and safety of etomidate-midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jung Min Lee; Geeho Min; Jae Min Lee; Seung Han Kim; Hyuk Soon Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hoon Jai Chun; Hong Sik Lee; Chang Duck Kim; Jong-Jae Park; Beom Jae Lee; Seong Ji Choi; Woojung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Deep sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  María E García Guzzo; María S Fernandez; Delfina Sanchez Novas; Sandra S Salgado; Sergio A Terrasa; Gonzalo Domenech; Carlos A Teijido
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.217

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.