| Literature DB >> 23110497 |
Jian Sun1, Yixi Luo, Zhen Tian, Liang Gu, Shu Chi Xia, Youcheng Yu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ERBB3 binding protein 1 (EBP1) gene transfer into human salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma cells has been shown to significantly inhibit cell proliferation and reduce tumor metastasis in mouse models. In the current study, to evaluate if EBP1 is a novel biomarker capable of identifying patients at higher risk of disease progression and recurrence, we examined the EBP1 expression profile in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patients and analyzed its clinicopathological relevance. To understand the underlying anti-metastatic mechanism, we investigated if EBP1 regulates invasion-related molecules.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23110497 PMCID: PMC3499390 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Figure 1Detection of EBP1 in ACC and adjacent non-cancerous tissues by immunohistochemical staining. Representative sections of solid (A1), tubular (B1) and cribriform (C1) patterns of ACCs showing intermediate (+) EBP1 staining (×40). Strongly positive staining (+++) was observed in adjacent non-cancerous tissues (A2, B2 and C2, 40). The same adjacent non-cancerous tissues (A3, B3 and C3) incubated with concentration-matched non-immune rabbit IgG showed no staining. Magnification of relevant parts of the images are included as insets.
Expression of Ebp1 in ACC and matched para-carcinoma tissues
| ACC | 9(13.64%) | 24(36.36%) | 23(34.85%) | 10(15.15%) |
| Para-Ca | 17(25.76%) | 3(4.55%) | 45(68.18%) | 1(1.52%) |
| P value | 0.0402 |
Relationship between Ebp1 expression and clinicopathological features of ACC patients
| Age at diagnosis | <=50 | 27 | 1(3.70%) | 6(22.22%) | 8(29.63%) | 12(44.44%) | 0.1597 | |
| >50 | 39 | 9(23.08%) | 3(7.69%) | 16(41.03%) | 11(28.21%) | | ||
| Gender | Male | 33 | 4(12.12%) | 5(15.15%) | 12(36.36%) | 12(36.36%) | 0.6956 | |
| Female | 33 | 6(18.18%) | 4(12.12%) | 12(36.36%) | 11(33.33%) | 0.6956 | ||
| Histologic subtypes | Tubular | 38 | 3(7.89%) | 1(2.63%) | 15(39.47%) | 19(50.00%) | 0.0005 | TvsS<.0001 |
| solid | 21 | 5(23.81%) | 6(28.57%) | 9(42.86%) | 1(4.76%) | TvsC0.2075 | ||
| cribriform | 7 | 2(28.57%) | 2(28.57%) | 0(0.00%) | 3(42.86%) | SvsC0.6393 | ||
| Lung metastasis | + | 16 | 8(50.00%) | 5(31.25%) | 2(12.50%) | 1(6.25%) | <0.0001 | |
| - | 50 | 3(6.00%) | 18(36.00%) | 12(24.00%) | 17(34.00%) | |||
| Lymphatic metastasis | + | 14 | 8(57.14%) | 6(42.86%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | <0.0001 | |
| - | 52 | 3(5.77%) | 17(32.69%) | 14(26.92%) | 18(34.62%) | |||
| Perineural invasion | + | 23 | 9(39.13%) | 8(34.78%) | 4(17.39%) | 2(8.70%) | 0.002 | |
| | - | 43 | 2(4.65%) | 15(34.88%) | 10(23.26%) | 16(37.21%) | | |
| TNMstaging | T1-2 | 42 | 3(7.14%) | 6(14.29%) | 15(35.71%) | 18(42.86%) | 0.0235 | |
| T3-4 | 24 | 7(29.17%) | 3(12.50%) | 9(37.50%) | 5(20.83%) | |||
Figure 2EBP1 suppresses the motility and invasiveness of ACC-M cells by modulating the expression of invasion-related molecules.A. Effect of EBP1 on cell migration was investigated using a wound-healing assay, as described in the Materials and Methods. B. EBP1 inhibits the invasion of ACC-M cells in vitro. Cells that penetrated through the Matrigel to the lower surface of the filter were stained with crystal violet. Quantification of cells in the lower chamber was performed by counting; the mean number of cells that invaded in three representative fields per well is expressed; bars, SD. *P<0.05. Data is representative of three independent experiments. C. Protein levels of MMP9, ICAM-1 and E-cadherin in ACC-M cell line stably transfected with pcDNA 3.1 or pcDNA-EBP1 plasmids were analyzed by western blotting assay, and GAPDH was used as a loading control. D. Columns represent relative band densities normalized to GAPDH as imaged in A. **P<0.05.
Correlation between Ebp1 and MMP9, ICAM-1 and E-cadherin immunostaining intensity in ACC tissues
| MMP9 | ||||||
| - | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0002 |
| + | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| ++ | 23 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16 | |
| +++ | 41 | 6 | 8 | 20 | 7 | |
| ICAM-1 | ||||||
| - | 50 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 0.6192 |
| + | 16 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | |
| ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| +++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| E-Cadherin | ||||||
| - | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | <.0001 |
| + | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 0 | |
| ++ | 18 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 1 | |
| +++ | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | |
Figure 3Disease-free survival in cases with adenoid cystic carcinoma. Disease-free survival of ACC patients was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with low or no EBP1 expression had significantly worse outcomes than patients showing higher EBP1 staining (P<0.0001, log rank test).