BACKGROUND: The variation of determinants of mental health with remoteness has rarely been directly examined. The current research aims to examine whether the association of psychosocial factors with psychological distress outcomes varies with increasing remoteness. METHODS: Participants were persons aged 55 and over from two community cohorts sampling from across rural and urban New South Wales (N = 4219; mean age = 69.00 years; 46.1% male). Measures of social support from these studies were calibrated to facilitate comparison across the sample. Remoteness was assessed using a continuous measure, the Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia. The association between demographic characteristics, social support, remoteness, and their interactions with remoteness in the prediction of high psychological distress (cut-off > 21 on the Kessler 10) were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Not being in a married or defacto relationship (OR 0.69; 99% CI 0.51-0.94), lower education (OR 0.52; 99% CI 0.38-0.71) and decreased social support (OR 0.36; 99% CI 0.31-0.42) significantly predicted psychological distress. There was a significant interaction of age and remoteness (OR 0.84; 99% CI 0.67-1.00), indicating that as remoteness increases, older persons are less likely to be highly distressed, as well as a significant interaction of social support and remoteness (OR 1.22; 99% CI 1.04-1.44), indicating that as remoteness decreases, persons with low levels of social support are more likely to be highly distressed. CONCLUSIONS: Remoteness may moderate the influence of social support and age on psychological distress outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The variation of determinants of mental health with remoteness has rarely been directly examined. The current research aims to examine whether the association of psychosocial factors with psychological distress outcomes varies with increasing remoteness. METHODS:Participants were persons aged 55 and over from two community cohorts sampling from across rural and urban New South Wales (N = 4219; mean age = 69.00 years; 46.1% male). Measures of social support from these studies were calibrated to facilitate comparison across the sample. Remoteness was assessed using a continuous measure, the Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia. The association between demographic characteristics, social support, remoteness, and their interactions with remoteness in the prediction of high psychological distress (cut-off > 21 on the Kessler 10) were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Not being in a married or defacto relationship (OR 0.69; 99% CI 0.51-0.94), lower education (OR 0.52; 99% CI 0.38-0.71) and decreased social support (OR 0.36; 99% CI 0.31-0.42) significantly predicted psychological distress. There was a significant interaction of age and remoteness (OR 0.84; 99% CI 0.67-1.00), indicating that as remoteness increases, older persons are less likely to be highly distressed, as well as a significant interaction of social support and remoteness (OR 1.22; 99% CI 1.04-1.44), indicating that as remoteness decreases, persons with low levels of social support are more likely to be highly distressed. CONCLUSIONS: Remoteness may moderate the influence of social support and age on psychological distress outcomes.
Authors: Brian J Kelly; Terry J Lewin; Helen J Stain; Clare Coleman; Michael Fitzgerald; David Perkins; Vaughan J Carr; Lyn Fragar; Jeffrey Fuller; David Lyle; John R Beard Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: J L Ayuso-Mateos; J L Vázquez-Barquero; C Dowrick; V Lehtinen; O S Dalgard; P Casey; C Wilkinson; L Lasa; H Page; G Dunn; G Wilkinson Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: R C Kessler; G Andrews; L J Colpe; E Hiripi; D K Mroczek; S L T Normand; E E Walters; A M Zaslavsky Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Kaaren J Watts; Louise H Good; Sandy McKiernan; Lisa Miller; Moira O'Connor; Robert Kane; Deborah J Kruger; Bree R Adams; Toni Musiello Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Tonelle E Handley; Brian J Kelly; Terry J Lewin; Clare Coleman; Helen J Stain; Natasha Weaver; Kerry J Inder Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kerry J Inder; Elizabeth G Holliday; Tonelle E Handley; Lyn J Fragar; Tony Lower; Angela Booth; Terry J Lewin; Brian J Kelly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joanne Allen; Kerry J Inder; Melissa L Harris; Terry J Lewin; John R Attia; Brian J Kelly Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Joanne Allen; Kerry J Inder; Terry J Lewin; John R Attia; Frances J Kay-Lambkin; Amanda L Baker; Trevor Hazell; Brian J Kelly Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Tonelle E Handley; Frances J Kay-Lambkin; Kerry J Inder; Terry J Lewin; John R Attia; Jeffrey Fuller; David Perkins; Clare Coleman; Natasha Weaver; Brian J Kelly Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 3.630