Literature DB >> 23109759

AMPLATZER Septal Occluder failure resulting in paradoxical cerebral embolism.

Rajeev R Fernando1, Ketan P Koranne, Colin M Barker.   

Abstract

Patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect are risk factors for paradoxical embolism and subsequent cerebral ischemic events. The transseptal passage of emboli from the right to the left cardiac chambers appears to play an important role. The therapeutic options are medical therapy (anti-aggregation or anticoagulation), surgical closure, or transcatheter closure. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects affords the advantage of closing an atrial defect without the associated morbidity of open-heart surgery and the bleeding sequelae of oral anticoagulation. After closure, however, the presence of a residual shunt is independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. Newer devices, such as the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder, have decreased the risk of residual shunting and thromboembolic events. In addition, they have a very low risk of device dislodgement, migration, and embolization.We describe the case of a 60-year-old woman with Ebstein anomaly and recurrent ischemic strokes who presented with acute ischemic infarcts and paradoxical embolism 3 years after undergoing transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect. A right-to-left shunt through a displaced AMPLATZER Septal Occluder was detected. Pulmonary hypertension and resultant right ventricular failure and right atrial dilation could have contributed to the persistent shunting and paradoxical embolism.To our knowledge, the delayed dysfunction of an AMPLATZER Septal Occluder has not been reported. In addition to describing the patient's case, we review the relevant medical literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ebstein anomaly/pathology; echocardiography; embolism, paradoxical/complications/epidemiology/etiology/physiopathology; foramen ovale, patent/therapy; heart septal defects, atrial/therapy; ischemic attack, transient/etiology/prevention & control; risk factors; septal occluder device; stroke/etiology/prevention & control; thrombosis/etiology

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109759      PMCID: PMC3461693     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  28 in total

1.  Prognosis after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for paradoxical embolism.

Authors:  A Wahl; B Meier; B Haxel; K Nedeltchev; M Arnold; E Eicher; M Sturzenegger; C Seiler; H P Mattle; S Windecker
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Long-term outcome of percutaneous closure of secundum-type atrial septal defects in adults.

Authors:  Justin G L M Luermans; Martijn C Post; Jurriën M ten Berg; H W Thijs Plokker; Maarten J Suttorp
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Removal of displaced and impacted ASD device after 4 years.

Authors:  R S Dhaliwal; H Singh; N Swami; V Srivastava
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Double standards in the world of ASD and PFO management: closure for paradoxical embolism.

Authors:  John D Carroll
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Aortic wall erosion after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Teresa López-Fernández; José Juan Gómez de Diego; María Carmen Monedero; David Cabestrero; José María Mesa; Isidro Moreno; Mar Moreno Yangüela; Esteban López de Sa; José Luis López-Sendoón
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial.

Authors:  Zhong Dong Du; Ziyad M Hijazi; Charles S Kleinman; Norman H Silverman; Kinley Larntz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  A noninvasive index of atrial remodeling in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Antonio Vincenti; Matteo Rota; Monica Spinelli; Mariella Corciulo; Sergio De Ceglia; Giovanni Rovaris; Laura Antolini; Simonetta Genovesi
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 1.438

8.  Erosion of an Amplatzer septal occluder device into the aortic root.

Authors:  Abdallah Kamouh; Mohammed Najeeb Osman; Noah Rosenthal; Arie Blitz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Impact of occluder device type on success of percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects--a medium-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Michael Becker; Dorothee Frings; Jörg Schröder; Christina Ocklenburg; Eberhard Mühler; Rainer Hoffmann; Andreas Franke; Wolfgang Lepper
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Characteristics of adult patients with atrial septal defects presenting with paradoxical embolism.

Authors:  Amr Bannan; Rhuna Shen; Frank E Silvestry; Howard C Herrmann
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  3 in total

1.  Delayed recurrent pleuropericardial effusions following atrial septal defect closure with Amplatzer septal occluder device: a case of postpericardiotomy syndrome?

Authors:  Grace Ghtk Kwok; Rachel Witts; Alessandra Frigiola
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-08

Review 2.  Amplatzer Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device-Related Complications.

Authors:  Beshoy Iskander; Fatima Anwer; Federico Oliveri; Kakargias Fotios; Priyanka Panday; Ana P Arcia Franchini; Pousette Hamid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-02

3.  A Rare Ultra-Long-Term Complication of Occluder Recanalization Due to Spontaneous Perforation of Polyvinyl Alcohol Membrane of Atrial Septal Defect Occluder: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kun Xiang; Huanwei Zhuang; Qin Wu; Mi Tang; Jinfu Yang; Chengming Fan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.