Literature DB >> 23109696

Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer.

Jean-Pierre Gérard1, David Azria, Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade, Isabelle Martel-Lafay, Christophe Hennequin, Pierre-Luc Etienne, Véronique Vendrely, Eric François, Guy de La Roche, Olivier Bouché, Xavier Mirabel, Bernard Denis, Laurent Mineur, Jean-François Berdah, Marc-André Mahé, Yves Bécouarn, Olivier Dupuis, Gérard Lledo, Jean-François Seitz, Laurent Bedenne, Béata Juzyna, Thierry Conroy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The ACCORD 12 trial investigated the value of two different preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) regimens in T3-4 Nx M0 resectable rectal cancer. Clinical results are reported after follow-up of 3 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2005 and July 2008, a total of 598 patients were randomly assigned to preoperative CT-RT with CAP45 (45-Gy RT for 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine) or CAPOX50 (50-Gy RT for 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Total mesorectal excision was planned 6 weeks after CT-RT. The primary end point was sterilization of the operative specimen, which was achieved in 13.9% versus 19.2% of patients, respectively (P = .09). Clinical results were analyzed for all randomly assigned patients according to the intention-to-treat principle.
RESULTS: At 3 years, there was no significant difference between CAP45 and CAPOX50 (cumulative incidence of local recurrence, 6.1% v 4.4%; overall survival, 87.6% v 88.3%; disease-free survival, 67.9% v 72.7%). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was reported in four patients in the CAP45 group and in two patients in the CAPOX50 group. Bowel continence, erectile dysfunction, and social life disturbance were not different between groups. In multivariate analysis, the sterilization rate (Dworak score) of the operative specimen was the main significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.50).
CONCLUSION: At 3 years, no significant difference in clinical outcome was achieved with the intensified CAPOX regimen. When compared with other recent randomized trials, these results indicate that concurrent administration of oxaliplatin and RT is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109696     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  127 in total

1.  The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Rob Glynne-Jones; Maher Hadaki; Mark Harrison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

2.  Factors associated with the location of local rectal cancer recurrence and predictors of survival.

Authors:  Peng Du; John P Burke; Wisam Khoury; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran; Feza H Remzi; David W Dietz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Review of systemic therapies for locally advanced and metastatic rectal cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Yaffee; Arsen Osipov; Carlyn Tan; Richard Tuli; Andrew Hendifar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Treatment of stage II-III rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Miranda B Kim; Theodore S Hong; Jennifer Y Wo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Undergoing Radical Surgery.

Authors:  Samy M AlGizawy; Hoda H Essa; Badawy M Ahmed
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-06-03

Review 6.  Personalized radiotherapy: concepts, biomarkers and trial design.

Authors:  A H Ree; K R Redalen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Recent advances in multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Eiji Oki; Koji Ando; Yuta Kasagi; Yoko Zaitsu; Masahiko Sugiyama; Yuichiro Nakashima; Hideto Sonoda; Kippei Ohgaki; Hiroshi Saeki; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keisuke Uehara; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 9.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Contemporary management of locally advanced rectal cancer: Resolving issues, controversies and shifting paradigms.

Authors:  Aeris Jane D Nacion; Youn Young Park; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.