Literature DB >> 23109629

The radiological parameters correlated with the alignment of the femoral component after Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement.

J G Kim1, N S Kasat, J H Bae, S J Kim, S M Oh, H C Lim.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the radiological parameters of femoral component alignment of the Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), and evaluate their effect on clinical outcome. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relative contributions of the radiological assessment of femoral component alignment in 189 consecutive UKRs performed by a single surgeon. The American Knee Society scores were compared between groups, defined as being within or outside recommended tolerances of the position of the femoral component. For the flexion/extension position 21 UKRs (11.1%) lay outside the recommended limits, and for posterior overhang of the femoral component nine (4.8%) lay outside the range. The pre-operative hip/knee/ankle (HKA) angle, narrowest canal distance from the distal femoral entry point of the alignment jig and coronal entry-point position had significant effects on the flexion/extension position. Pre-operative HKA angle had a significant influence on posterior overhang of the femoral component. However, there was no significant difference in American Knee Society scores relative to the position of the femoral component.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109629     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.29217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  6 in total

1.  Component positioning of the first 300 mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Landon H Morikawa; Dylan B Combs; Samantha N Andrews; Kristin Mathews; Cass K Nakasone
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-10

2.  Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA.

Authors:  Justin A M J van Leeuwen; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Robotic Assisted Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cuneyt Tamam; Johannes F Plate; Marco Augart; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-09-03

4.  Inaccurate rotational component position in image-free navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Akihiko Toda; Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hiroshi Sasaki; Koji Takayama; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka; Nao Shibanuma
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2016-01-26

5.  Implant Overhang after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Oxford Prosthesis versus Miller-Galante II Prosthesis.

Authors:  Geon-Hyeong Kim; Bum-Yong Park; Tae-Yong Bae; Kwang-Yun Song; Yong In
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-30

6.  Intentionally Increased Flexion Angle of the Femoral Component in Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kye-Youl Cho; Kang-Il Kim; Sang-Jun Song; Kyu-Jin Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-03-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.