INTRODUCTION: Although it is standard procedure in the evaluation of liver diseases, biopsy is an invasive method subject to sampling error and intra or inter-observer variability. Thus, surrogate markers of liver fibrosis have been proposed, with variable availability and accuracy. AIM: Validate and compare the performance of APRI and FIB-4 as predictors of liver fibrosis in HCV patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study including patients with HCV-RNA (+) who underwent liver biopsy. Significant fibrosis was defined as METAVIR stage ≥ 2. The diagnostic performance of the models in predicting significant fibrosis were evaluated and compared by ROC curves. RESULTS: The study included 119 patients, mean age 43.7 ± 10.6 years and 62% males. Significant fibrosis was identified in 41 patients. The AUROCs observed were: APRI = 0.793 ± 0.047, FIB-4 = 0.811 ± 0.045 and AST/ALT = 0.661 ± 0.055 (P = 0.054 for APRI vs. AST/ALT, and P = 0.014 for FIB-4 vs. AST/ALT). Considering classic cutoffs, the PPV and NPV for APRI and FIB-4 were, respectively, 77% and 92% and 83% and 81%. Thirteen (19%) patients were misdiagnosed by APRI and 16 (18%) by FIB-4. By restricting the indication of liver biopsy to patients with intermediate values, it could have been correctly avoided in 47% and 63% of the patients with APRI and FIB-4, respectively. CONCLUSION: The models APRI and FIB-4 were superior to AST/ALT ratio in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic HCV infection. Even though the overall performance of APRI and FIB-4 was similar, a higher proportion of patients may be correctly classified by FIB-4.
INTRODUCTION: Although it is standard procedure in the evaluation of liver diseases, biopsy is an invasive method subject to sampling error and intra or inter-observer variability. Thus, surrogate markers of liver fibrosis have been proposed, with variable availability and accuracy. AIM: Validate and compare the performance of APRI and FIB-4 as predictors of liver fibrosis in HCV patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study including patients with HCV-RNA (+) who underwent liver biopsy. Significant fibrosis was defined as METAVIR stage ≥ 2. The diagnostic performance of the models in predicting significant fibrosis were evaluated and compared by ROC curves. RESULTS: The study included 119 patients, mean age 43.7 ± 10.6 years and 62% males. Significant fibrosis was identified in 41 patients. The AUROCs observed were: APRI = 0.793 ± 0.047, FIB-4 = 0.811 ± 0.045 and AST/ALT = 0.661 ± 0.055 (P = 0.054 for APRI vs. AST/ALT, and P = 0.014 for FIB-4 vs. AST/ALT). Considering classic cutoffs, the PPV and NPV for APRI and FIB-4 were, respectively, 77% and 92% and 83% and 81%. Thirteen (19%) patients were misdiagnosed by APRI and 16 (18%) by FIB-4. By restricting the indication of liver biopsy to patients with intermediate values, it could have been correctly avoided in 47% and 63% of the patients with APRI and FIB-4, respectively. CONCLUSION: The models APRI and FIB-4 were superior to AST/ALT ratio in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic HCV infection. Even though the overall performance of APRI and FIB-4 was similar, a higher proportion of patients may be correctly classified by FIB-4.
Authors: G Shiha; S Seif; A Eldesoky; M Elbasiony; R Soliman; A Metwally; K Zalata; N Mikhail Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 6.047
Authors: Paul M Trembling; Sudeep Tanwar; William M Rosenberg; Geoffrey M Dusheiko Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Audrey L French; Jonathan W Martin; Charlesnika T Evans; Marion Peters; Seble G Kessaye; Marek Nowicki; Mark Kuniholm; Elizabeth Golub; Michael Augenbraun; Seema N Desai Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Erin M Kelly; Jennifer L Dodge; Peter Bacchetti; Monika Sarkar; Audrey L French; Phyllis C Tien; Marshall J Glesby; Elizabeth T Golub; Michael Augenbraun; Michael Plankey; Marion G Peters Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 9.079