Literature DB >> 23109263

Solvent-driven symmetry of self-assembled nanocrystal superlattices--a computational study.

Ananth P Kaushik1, Paulette Clancy.   

Abstract

The preference of experimentally realistic sized 4-nm facetted nanocrystals (NCs), emulating Pb chalcogenide quantum dots, to spontaneously choose a crystal habit for NC superlattices (Face Centered Cubic (FCC) vs. Body Centered Cubic (BCC)) is investigated using molecular simulation approaches. Molecular dynamics simulations, using united atom force fields, are conducted to simulate systems comprised of cube-octahedral-shaped NCs covered by alkyl ligands, in the absence and presence of experimentally used solvents, toluene and hexane. System sizes in the 400,000-500,000-atom scale followed for nanoseconds are required for this computationally intensive study. The key questions addressed here concern the thermodynamic stability of the superlattice and its preference of symmetry, as we vary the ligand length of the chains, from 9 to 24 -CH(2) groups, and the choice of solvent. We find that hexane and toluene are "good" solvents for the NCs, which penetrate the ligand corona all the way to the NC surfaces. We determine the free energy difference between FCC and BCC NC superlattice symmetries to determine the system's preference for either geometry, as the ratio of the length of the ligand to the diameter of the NC is varied. We explain these preferences in terms of different mechanisms in play, whose relative strength determines the overall choice of geometry.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109263     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  6 in total

1.  Energy landscape of self-assembled superlattices of PbSe nanocrystals.

Authors:  Zewei Quan; Di Wu; Jinlong Zhu; Wiel H Evers; James M Boncella; Laurens D A Siebbeles; Zhongwu Wang; Alexandra Navrotsky; Hongwu Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Kinetics of the self-assembly of nanocrystal superlattices measured by real-time in situ X-ray scattering.

Authors:  Mark C Weidman; Detlef-M Smilgies; William A Tisdale
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Connecting the particles in the box--controlled fusion of hexamer nanocrystal clusters within an AB₆ binary nanocrystal superlattice.

Authors:  Benjamin E Treml; Binit Lukose; Paulette Clancy; Detlef-M Smilgies; Tobias Hanrath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Colloidal Self-Assembly of Inorganic Nanocrystals into Superlattice Thin-Films and Multiscale Nanostructures.

Authors:  Hongseok Yun; Taejong Paik
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Supercrystallography-Based Decoding of Structure and Driving Force of Nanocrystal Assembly.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Zhongwu Wang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  On the Formation of Honeycomb Superlattices from PbSe Quantum Dots: The Role of Solvent-Mediated Repulsion and Facet-to-Facet Attraction in NC Self-Assembly and Alignment.

Authors:  Maaike M van der Sluijs; Dinja Sanders; Kevin J Jansen; Giuseppe Soligno; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh; Joep L Peters
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.126

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.