Literature DB >> 23109246

Comparison of two simulation methods to compute solvation free energies and partition coefficients.

Li Yang1, Alauddin Ahmed, Stanley I Sandler.   

Abstract

The thermodynamic integration (TI) and expanded ensemble (EE) methods are used here to calculate the hydration free energy in water, the solvation free energy in 1-octanol, and the octanol-water partition coefficient for a six compounds of varying functionality using the optimized potentials for liquid simulations (OPLS) all-atom (AA) force field parameters and atomic charges. Both methods use the molecular dynamics algorithm as a primary component of the simulation protocol, and both have found wide applications in fields such as the calculation of activity coefficients, phase behavior, and partition coefficients. Both methods result in solvation free energies and 1-octanol/water partition coefficients with average absolute deviations (AAD) from experimental data to within 4 kJ/mol and 0.5 log units, respectively. Here, we find that in simulations the OPLS-AA force field parameters (with fixed charges) can reproduce solvation free energies of solutes in 1-octanol with AAD of about half that for the solute hydration free energies using a extended simple point charge (SPC/E) model of water. The computational efficiency of the two simulation methods are compared based on the time (in nanoseconds) required to obtain similar standard deviations in the solvation free energies and 1-octanol/water partition coefficients. By this analysis, the EE method is found to be a factor of nine more efficient than the TI algorithm. For both methods, solvation free energy calculations in 1-octanol consume roughly an order of magnitude more CPU hours than the hydration free energy calculations.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109246     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  8 in total

1.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Study of procaine and tetracaine in the lipid bilayer using molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Seifollah Jalili; Marzieh Saeedi
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6 challenge using the SM12, SM8, and SMD solvation models.

Authors:  Jonathan A Ouimet; Andrew S Paluch
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients using molecular simulation for the SAMPL7 challenge: comparing the use of neat and water saturated 1-octanol.

Authors:  Spencer J Sabatino; Andrew S Paluch
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Kalistyn H Burley; Michael Chiu; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Approaches for calculating solvation free energies and enthalpies demonstrated with an update of the FreeSolv database.

Authors:  Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; Daisy Y Kyu; Hannes H Loeffler; John D Chodera; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Eng Data       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Molecular dynamics simulations of water/mucus partition coefficients for feeding stimulants in fish and the implications for olfaction.

Authors:  Alex D Rygg; Adri C T van Duin; Brent A Craven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  From adaptive resolution to molecular dynamics of open systems.

Authors:  Robinson Cortes-Huerto; Matej Praprotnik; Kurt Kremer; Luigi Delle Site
Journal:  Eur Phys J B       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 1.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.