Stephan Borte1, Ulrika von Döbeln, Lennart Hammarström. 1. Division of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Jeffrey Modell Diagnostic and Research Center for Primary Immunodeficiencies, Stockholm, Sweden. stephan.borte@ki.se
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Technical possibilities to screen for inborn errors of immune function at the neonatal stage have been rapidly progressing, whereas the guidelines that apply for the evaluation of benefits and concerns on expanding screening panels have not been broadly discussed for primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID). This review reflects on the assessment of severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID), primary agammaglobulinaemias (such as X-linked agammaglobulinaemia) and inherited haemophagocytic syndromes (such as familial haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis) to be included in newborn screening (NBS) programmes. RECENT FINDINGS: Screening programmes in several federal states in the United States have been supplemented with the T-cell receptor excision circle assay during the past few years to identify children with SCID. The reported experience indicates that an efficient and validated screening approach for SCID is feasible on a population-based scale. SUMMARY: In the light of recent advances, severe PID ought to be discussed for their rapid implementation in national NBS programmes based upon clinical, social and economical criteria as consolidated in the extended 22-item Wilson-Jungner framework. Although SCID currently most favourably fulfils these screening guidelines, other strong candidates can be identified among primary immunodeficiency disorders. Future efforts of healthcare professionals and policy makers are essential to improve the concept of neonatal screening for PID.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Technical possibilities to screen for inborn errors of immune function at the neonatal stage have been rapidly progressing, whereas the guidelines that apply for the evaluation of benefits and concerns on expanding screening panels have not been broadly discussed for primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID). This review reflects on the assessment of severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID), primary agammaglobulinaemias (such as X-linked agammaglobulinaemia) and inherited haemophagocytic syndromes (such as familial haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis) to be included in newborn screening (NBS) programmes. RECENT FINDINGS: Screening programmes in several federal states in the United States have been supplemented with the T-cell receptor excision circle assay during the past few years to identify children with SCID. The reported experience indicates that an efficient and validated screening approach for SCID is feasible on a population-based scale. SUMMARY: In the light of recent advances, severe PID ought to be discussed for their rapid implementation in national NBS programmes based upon clinical, social and economical criteria as consolidated in the extended 22-item Wilson-Jungner framework. Although SCID currently most favourably fulfils these screening guidelines, other strong candidates can be identified among primary immunodeficiency disorders. Future efforts of healthcare professionals and policy makers are essential to improve the concept of neonatal screening for PID.
Authors: Linda M Griffith; Morton J Cowan; Luigi D Notarangelo; Donald B Kohn; Jennifer M Puck; Sung-Yun Pai; Barbara Ballard; Sarah C Bauer; Jack J H Bleesing; Marcia Boyle; Amy Brower; Rebecca H Buckley; Mirjam van der Burg; Lauri M Burroughs; Fabio Candotti; Andrew J Cant; Talal Chatila; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Mary C Dinauer; Christopher C Dvorak; Alexandra H Filipovich; Thomas A Fleisher; Hubert Bobby Gaspar; Tayfun Gungor; Elie Haddad; Emily Hovermale; Faith Huang; Alan Hurley; Mary Hurley; Sumathi Iyengar; Elizabeth M Kang; Brent R Logan; Janel R Long-Boyle; Harry L Malech; Sean A McGhee; Fred Modell; Vicki Modell; Hans D Ochs; Richard J O'Reilly; Robertson Parkman; David J Rawlings; John M Routes; William T Shearer; Trudy N Small; Heather Smith; Kathleen E Sullivan; Paul Szabolcs; Adrian Thrasher; Troy R Torgerson; Paul Veys; Kenneth Weinberg; Juan Carlos Zuniga-Pflucker Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Jet van der Spek; Rolf H H Groenwold; Mirjam van der Burg; Joris M van Montfrans Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Marco Chiarini; Cinzia Zanotti; Federico Serana; Alessandra Sottini; Diego Bertoli; Luigi Caimi; Luisa Imberti Journal: J Public Health Res Date: 2013-05-01