Literature DB >> 23107610

Is maternal posturing during labor efficient in preventing persistent occiput posterior position? A randomized controlled trial.

Raoul Desbriere1, Julie Blanc, Renaud Le Dû, Jean-Paul Renner, Xavier Carcopino, Anderson Loundou, Claude d'Ercole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy of maternal posturing during labor on the prevention of persistent occiput posterior (OP) position. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a randomized trial including 220 patients in labor with a single fetus in documented OP position. Main outcome was the proportion of anterior rotation from OP position.
RESULTS: The rates of anterior rotation were, respectively, 78.2% and 76.4% in the intervention group and the control group without significant difference (P = .748). Rates of instrumental and cesarean section deliveries were not significantly different between intervention and control groups (18.2% vs. 19.1%, P = .89, and 19.1% vs. 17.3%, P = .73, respectively). In intervention and control groups, persistent OP position rates were significantly higher among women who had cesarean section (71.4% and 89.5%, respectively) and an instrumental delivery (25% and 33.3%, respectively) than among women who achieved spontaneous vaginal birth (5.8% and 2.8%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, body mass index and parity were found to have significant and independent impact on the probability of fetal head rotation.
CONCLUSION: Our study failed to demonstrate any maternal or neonatal benefit to a policy of maternal posturing for the management of OP position during labor.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107610     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Maternal postures for fetal malposition in labour for improving the health of mothers and their infants.

Authors:  Jennifer A Barrowclough; Luling Lin; Bridget Kool; G Justus Hofmeyr; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-31

2.  Delivery Mode After Manual Rotation of Occiput Posterior Fetal Positions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Caroline Verhaeghe; Romain Corroenne; Andrew Spiers; Philippe Descamps; Géraldine Gascoin; Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet; Elsa Parot-Schinkel; Guillaume Legendre
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Women's choice of positions during labour: return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Stefania Di Gangi; Marco Noventa; Veronica Bacile; Alessandra Zambon; Giovanni Battista Nardelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Pregnant women's views on the acceptability, enablers, and barriers of participation in a randomized controlled trial of maternal posture for fetal malposition in labor.

Authors:  Jennifer Barrowclough; Bridget Kool; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-01-28

5.  Maternal positioning to correct occiput posterior fetal position during the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M J Guittier; V Othenin-Girard; B de Gasquet; O Irion; M Boulvain
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Assessing feasibility and maternal acceptability of a biomechanically-optimized supine birth position: A pilot study.

Authors:  Lisa Bouille; Joanna Sichitiu; Julien Favre; David Desseauve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.