OBJECTIVE: To present an effective classification method based on the prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni in the community. METHODS: We created decision rules (defined by cut-offs for number of positive slides), which account for imperfect sensitivity, both with a simple adjustment of fixed sensitivity and with a more complex adjustment of changing sensitivity with prevalence. To reduce screening costs while maintaining accuracy, we propose a pooled classification method. To estimate sensitivity, we use the De Vlas model for worm and egg distributions. We compare the proposed method with the standard method to investigate differences in efficiency, measured by number of slides read, and accuracy, measured by probability of correct classification. RESULTS: Modelling varying sensitivity lowers the lower cut-off more significantly than the upper cut-off, correctly classifying regions as moderate rather than lower, thus receiving life-saving treatment. The classification method goes directly to classification on the basis of positive pools, avoiding having to know sensitivity to estimate prevalence. For model parameter values describing worm and egg distributions among children, the pooled method with 25 slides achieves an expected 89.9% probability of correct classification, whereas the standard method with 50 slides achieves 88.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Among children, it is more efficient and more accurate to use the pooled method for classification of S. mansoni prevalence than the current standard method.
OBJECTIVE: To present an effective classification method based on the prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni in the community. METHODS: We created decision rules (defined by cut-offs for number of positive slides), which account for imperfect sensitivity, both with a simple adjustment of fixed sensitivity and with a more complex adjustment of changing sensitivity with prevalence. To reduce screening costs while maintaining accuracy, we propose a pooled classification method. To estimate sensitivity, we use the De Vlas model for worm and egg distributions. We compare the proposed method with the standard method to investigate differences in efficiency, measured by number of slides read, and accuracy, measured by probability of correct classification. RESULTS: Modelling varying sensitivity lowers the lower cut-off more significantly than the upper cut-off, correctly classifying regions as moderate rather than lower, thus receiving life-saving treatment. The classification method goes directly to classification on the basis of positive pools, avoiding having to know sensitivity to estimate prevalence. For model parameter values describing worm and egg distributions among children, the pooled method with 25 slides achieves an expected 89.9% probability of correct classification, whereas the standard method with 50 slides achieves 88.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Among children, it is more efficient and more accurate to use the pooled method for classification of S. mansoni prevalence than the current standard method.
Keywords:
Katz‐Kato; S. mansoni; S. mansoni prevalence estimation; clasificación; classification; control enfermedades; cálculo prevalencia S. mansoni; disease control; estimation; lutte contre les maladies; pooled testing; pruebas de grupo; prévalence; test poolé
Authors: Narcis B Kabatereine; Simon Brooker; Edridah M Tukahebwa; Francis Kazibwe; Ambrose W Onapa Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: R C Ratard; L E Kouemeni; M M Bessala; C N Ndamkou; G J Greer; J Spilsbury; B L Cline Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Simon Brooker; Narcis B Kabatereine; Mark Myatt; J Russell Stothard; Alan Fenwick Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Archie C A Clements; Nicholas J S Lwambo; Lynsey Blair; Ursuline Nyandindi; Godfrey Kaatano; Safari Kinung'hi; Joanne P Webster; Alan Fenwick; Simon Brooker Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Archie C A Clements; Elisa Bosqué-Oliva; Moussa Sacko; Aly Landouré; Robert Dembélé; Mamadou Traoré; Godefroy Coulibaly; Albis F Gabrielli; Alan Fenwick; Simon Brooker Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2009-05-05