OBJECTIVE: Access to improved water sources is rapidly expanding in rural central Vietnam. We examined one NGO-led piped water supply programme to assess the drinking water quality and health impacts of piped water systems where access to 'improved' water sources is already good. METHODS: This longitudinal, prospective cohort study followed 300 households in seven project areas in Da Nang province, Vietnam: 224 households who paid for an on-plot piped water connection and 76 control households from the same areas relying primarily on 'improved' water sources outside the home. The 4-month study was intended to measure the impact of the NGO-led water programmes on households' drinking water quality and health and to evaluate system performance. RESULTS: We found that: (i) households connected to a piped water supply had consistently better drinking water quality than those relying on other sources, including 'improved' sources and (ii) connected households experienced less diarrhoea than households without a piped water connection (adjusted longitudinal prevalence ratio: 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.86, P = 0.006) and households using an 'improved' source not piped to the plot: (adjusted longitudinal prevalence ratio: 0.59 (95% CI 0.39-0.91, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that on-plot water service yields benefits over other sources that are considered 'improved' by the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme.
OBJECTIVE: Access to improved water sources is rapidly expanding in rural central Vietnam. We examined one NGO-led piped water supply programme to assess the drinking water quality and health impacts of piped water systems where access to 'improved' water sources is already good. METHODS: This longitudinal, prospective cohort study followed 300 households in seven project areas in Da Nang province, Vietnam: 224 households who paid for an on-plot piped water connection and 76 control households from the same areas relying primarily on 'improved' water sources outside the home. The 4-month study was intended to measure the impact of the NGO-led water programmes on households' drinking water quality and health and to evaluate system performance. RESULTS: We found that: (i) households connected to a piped water supply had consistently better drinking water quality than those relying on other sources, including 'improved' sources and (ii) connected households experienced less diarrhoea than households without a piped water connection (adjusted longitudinal prevalence ratio: 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.86, P = 0.006) and households using an 'improved' source not piped to the plot: (adjusted longitudinal prevalence ratio: 0.59 (95% CI 0.39-0.91, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that on-plot water service yields benefits over other sources that are considered 'improved' by the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme.
Authors: Kristen Heitzinger; Claudio A Rocha; Robert E Quick; Silvia M Montano; Drake H Tilley; Charles N Mock; A Jannet Carrasco; Ricardo M Cabrera; Stephen E Hawes Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Joshua V Garn; Jennifer L Wilkers; Ashley A Meehan; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Jacob Burns; Rubina Imtiaz; Matthew C Freeman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-06-21
Authors: Jennyfer Wolf; Sydney Hubbard; Michael Brauer; Argaw Ambelu; Benjamin F Arnold; Robert Bain; Valerie Bauza; Joe Brown; Bethany A Caruso; Thomas Clasen; John M Colford; Matthew C Freeman; Bruce Gordon; Richard B Johnston; Andrew Mertens; Annette Prüss-Ustün; Ian Ross; Jeffrey Stanaway; Jeff T Zhao; Oliver Cumming; Sophie Boisson Journal: Lancet Date: 2022-07-02 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Steev Loyola; Juan F Sanchez; Edson Maguiña; Enrique Canal; Rosa Castillo; Manuela Bernal; Yocelinda Meza; Drake H Tilley; William E Oswald; Kristen Heitzinger; Andres G Lescano; Claudio A Rocha Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Ameer Shaheed; Jennifer Orgill; Maggie A Montgomery; Marc A Jeuland; Joe Brown Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Mia Catharine Mattioli; Alexandria B Boehm; Jennifer Davis; Angela R Harris; Mwifadhi Mrisho; Amy J Pickering Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 3.240