Literature DB >> 23107372

Influence of achieved paternity on quality of life in testicular cancer survivors.

Brigitte Stoehr1, Lydia Schachtner, Renate Pichler, Bernhard Holzner, Johannes Giesinger, Anne Oberguggenberger, Nicolai Leonhartsberger, Wolfgang Horninger, Hannes Steiner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of achieved/non-achieved paternity on quality of life (QoL) in testicular cancer (TC) survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We invited TC survivors treated at our department between 1989 and 2006 to complete a QoL assessment, including the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0©)/+ TC26, and follow-up questions. A total of 311 TC survivors answered the questionnaire, of whom 207 patients who did not desire paternity were excluded. The remaining 104 patients who stated a desire for paternity after TC treatment were further divided in group A (TC survivors who achieved paternity; n = 51) and group B (TC survivors who did not achieve paternity; n = 53). The data obtained were statistically analysed.
RESULTS: Significant differences between groups regarding QoL were detected for social functioning (P = 0.002), emotional functioning (P = 0.001), general QoL (P = 0.018), fatigue (P = 0.025), pain (P = 0.01), sleeping problems (P = 0.024), treatment satisfaction (P = 0.039), financial aspects (P = 0.006), sexual problems (P = 0.017), body image problems (P < 0.001), dyspnoea (P = 0.005) and cognitive functioning (P = 0.019). For all scales except 'sexual enjoyment', patients in group A were found to have a better long-term QoL than those in group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Whilst acknowledging the shortcomings in retrospective analyses, we believe our data clearly underline the important impact on QoL for TC survivors of achieved paternity. Counselling patients early at diagnosis as well as using cryopreservation of semen in all potential patients before treatment (only excluding patients definitely claiming they do not wish to achieve paternity) should therefore be regarded as the standard of care.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107372     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11579.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Utilization of sperm banking and barriers to its use in testicular cancer patients.

Authors:  D W Sonnenburg; M J Brames; S Case-Eads; L H Einhorn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Cancer-Related Worry and Physical Well-Being in the Context of Perceived Stress in Young Adults with Testicular Cancer.

Authors:  Katie Darabos; Michael A Hoyt
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 3.  Fertility preservation of patients with testicular cancer.

Authors:  Itsuto Hamano; Shingo Hatakeyama; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-18

Review 4.  Caregiver Emotional Burden in Testicular Cancer Patients: From Patient to Caregiver Support.

Authors:  Silvia De Padova; Chiara Casadei; Alejandra Berardi; Tatiana Bertelli; Alessia Filograna; Maria Concetta Cursano; Cecilia Menna; Salvatore Luca Burgio; Amelia Altavilla; Giuseppe Schepisi; Sabrina Prati; Sandra Montalti; Michal Chovanec; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Luigi Grassi; Michal Mego; Ugo De Giorgi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.555

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.