Meenakshi Jolly1, Nazia Kazmi2, Rachel A Mikolaitis3, Winston Sequeira3, Joel A Block3. 1. Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: Meenakshi_Jolly@rush.edu. 2. Section of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) has not been validated using rheumatologist-conducted disease activity and damage assessments, especially cutaneous assessments. Active skin disease and skin damage may have substantial effects on patient-reported outcomes and on body image. OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate the CLASI against: (1) physician-assessed disease activity and damage measures; and (2) patient-reported assessment of quality of life and body image. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 31 patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Cutaneous disease activity and damage were measured by using the CLASI. Disease activity (using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [SLE] Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI}), damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaboration Clinics-American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI]), quality of life (LupusPRO), and body image (Body Image Quality of Life Inventory) were obtained. Descriptive statistics and Spearman correlations were ascertained. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age was 42.3 (12.8) years; 97% were women. The mean (SD) CLASI activity and damage scores were 10.5 (7.4) and 9.9 (9.5). Correlations noted were: total CLASI activity and SLEDAI-rash (r = 0.42, P = .02), CLASI-mucosal and SLEDAI-mucosal (r = 0.65, P = .001), CLASI-recent hair loss and SLEDAI-alopecia (r = 0.61, P = .001), and total CLASI activity and LupusPRO symptoms domain (r = -0.38, P = .04). Total CLASI-damage correlated with SDI-scarring/alopecia (r = 0.51, P = .004), SDI-extensive scarring/panniculum (r = 0.55, P = .003), and SDI-skin ulceration (r = 0.36, P = .05). CLASI scalp scarring correlated with SDI-skin scarring/alopecia (r = 0.94, P = .001). CLASI activity on the face and nose was associated with significant concerns on the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include small sample size. CONCLUSION: CLASI activity and damage scores correlate with physician-assessed cutaneous activity and damage in cutaneous lupus erythematosus in patients with SLE. Cutaneous activity in visible areas may generate body image concerns.
BACKGROUND: The Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) has not been validated using rheumatologist-conducted disease activity and damage assessments, especially cutaneous assessments. Active skin disease and skin damage may have substantial effects on patient-reported outcomes and on body image. OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate the CLASI against: (1) physician-assessed disease activity and damage measures; and (2) patient-reported assessment of quality of life and body image. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 31 patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Cutaneous disease activity and damage were measured by using the CLASI. Disease activity (using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [SLE] Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI}), damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaboration Clinics-American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI]), quality of life (LupusPRO), and body image (Body Image Quality of Life Inventory) were obtained. Descriptive statistics and Spearman correlations were ascertained. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age was 42.3 (12.8) years; 97% were women. The mean (SD) CLASI activity and damage scores were 10.5 (7.4) and 9.9 (9.5). Correlations noted were: total CLASI activity and SLEDAI-rash (r = 0.42, P = .02), CLASI-mucosal and SLEDAI-mucosal (r = 0.65, P = .001), CLASI-recent hair loss and SLEDAI-alopecia (r = 0.61, P = .001), and total CLASI activity and LupusPRO symptoms domain (r = -0.38, P = .04). Total CLASI-damage correlated with SDI-scarring/alopecia (r = 0.51, P = .004), SDI-extensive scarring/panniculum (r = 0.55, P = .003), and SDI-skin ulceration (r = 0.36, P = .05). CLASI scalp scarring correlated with SDI-skin scarring/alopecia (r = 0.94, P = .001). CLASI activity on the face and nose was associated with significant concerns on the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include small sample size. CONCLUSION: CLASI activity and damage scores correlate with physician-assessed cutaneous activity and damage in cutaneous lupus erythematosus in patients with SLE. Cutaneous activity in visible areas may generate body image concerns.
Authors: Josef Symon S Concha; Aikaterini Patsatsi; Ann Marshak-Rothstein; Ming-Lin Liu; Animesh A Sinha; Lela A Lee; Joseph F Merola; Ali Jabbari; Johann E Gudjonsson; François Chasset; Paul Jarrett; Benjamin Chong; Lisa Arkin; Anthony P Fernandez; Marzia Caproni; Steven A Greenberg; Hee Joo Kim; David R Pearson; Alisa Femia; Ruth Ann Vleugels; David Fiorentino; Manabu Fujimoto; Joerg Wenzel; Victoria P Werth Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Joan T Merrill; Susan Manzi; Cynthia Aranow; Anca Askanase; Ian Bruce; Eliza Chakravarty; Ben Chong; Karen Costenbader; Maria Dall'Era; Ellen Ginzler; Leslie Hanrahan; Ken Kalunian; Joseph Merola; Sandra Raymond; Brad Rovin; Amit Saxena; Victoria P Werth Journal: Lupus Sci Med Date: 2018-03-23