Literature DB >> 23107011

Image-guided percutaneous renal cryoablation: preoperative risk factors for recurrence and complications.

Michael L Blute1, Zhamshid Okhunov, Daniel M Moreira, Arvin K George, Suzanne Sunday, Igor I Lobko, Manish A Vira.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scoring system in predicting treatment success for image-guided percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 139 patients with renal masses treated with PCA. Preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images were reviewed by a urology resident. The primary endpoint variable was incomplete treatment or tumour recurrence. R.E.N.A.L. scores were categorized into low (4-6), moderate (7-9), and high (10-12). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict tumour recurrence. Additional variables collected included age at surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, lesion size, skin-to-tumour distance, skin-to-hilum distance, and number of treatment cryoprobes.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 24 months, there were 10 tumour recurrences (six moderate and four high R.E.N.A.L. score categories). Nephrometry score and number of probes used were not associated with recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, P = 0.9 and P = 0.53, respectively). The tumour distances for patients with recurrence and no recurrence were 10.8 cm and 8.5 cm, respectively (P ≤ 0.05), the skin-to-tumour distance was associated with treatment failure (OR 1.24, P = 0.015); for each unit increase in the mean value, patients were 1.5 times more likely to have a tumour recurrence (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.72). The model that best predicted complications included the number of probes used (P = 0.002) and R.E.N.A.L. score (OR 1.35, P = 0.027). For each additional probe used, patients were twice as likely to have complications (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.28-3.05). With each unit increase in R.E.N.A.L. score, patients were 1.5 times more likely to experience a complication (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.11).
CONCLUSIONS: An increased skin-to-tumour distance is associated with a higher risk of treatment failure after PCA. Furthermore, an increase in both R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score and number of probes used was associated with an increased risk of complications after PCA. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score as a measure of tumour complexity was not associated with tumour recurrence.
© 2012 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107011     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11538.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Impact of tumor histology and grade on treatment success of percutaneous renal cryoablation.

Authors:  Alp Tuna Beksac; Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz; Catherine A Dufour; Unwanaobong Nseyo; Zachary Hamilton; Sean W Berquist; Abd-elRahman Hassan; Omer A Raheem; Song Wang; Robert W Wake; Robert E Gold; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Skin-to-tumor Distance Predicts Treatment Failure of T1A Renal Cell Carcinoma Following Percutaneous Cryoablation.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Kamaljot Kaler; Ramy F Youssef; Rahul Dutta; Arkadiy Palvanov; Paras Shah; Kathryn Osann; David N Siegel; Igor Lobko; Louis Kavoussi; Ralph V Clayman; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence for the Management of T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: What IRs Need to Know for Kidney Cancer Tumor Boards.

Authors:  Julie Cronan; Sean Dariushnia; Zachary Bercu; Robert Mitchell Ermentrout; Bill Majdalany; Laura Findeiss; Janice Newsome; Nima Kokabi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation.

Authors:  Sagar Rohitkumar Patel; Sean Francois; Tiagpaul Bhamber; Holt Evans; Kris Gaston; Stephen B Riggs; Chris Teigland; Peter E Clark; Ornob P Roy
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-03-23

5.  Kidney cancer focal cryoablation trend: does location or approach matter?

Authors:  O Rodriguez Faba; F Sanguedolce; P Grange; G Kooiman; A Bakavicius; P De la Torre; J Palou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Fe3O4 nanoparticles and cryoablation enhance ice crystal formation to improve the efficiency of killing breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Ping Ye; Yu Kong; Xiaojing Chen; Weijie Li; Dejun Liu; Yuexia Xie; Yan Zhou; Hanbing Zou; Zhaohua Chang; Huili Dai; Xianming Kong; Peifeng Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Risk factors for abdominal wall pseudohernia after percutaneous cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Takahiro Higuchi; Kanichiro Shimizu; Keitaro Enoki; Kenji Motohashi; Yoshihiko Kameoka; Naoki Kurata; Jun Miki; Haruki Sekiguchi; Shunichi Sadaoka
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Enhanced killing of HepG2 during cryosurgery with Fe3O4-nanoparticle improved intracellular ice formation and cell dehydration.

Authors:  Fuquan Yuan; Gang Zhao; Fazil Panhwar
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-05

9.  Percutaneous CT-Guided Renal Cryoablation: Technical Aspects, Safety, and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in a Single Center.

Authors:  Stefano Cernic; Cristina Marrocchio; Riccardo Ciabattoni; Ilaria Fiorese; Fulvio Stacul; Fabiola Giudici; Michele Rizzo; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.