Literature DB >> 2310695

The position of the M-BCR breakpoint does not predict the duration of chronic phase or survival in chronic myeloid leukemia.

J Jaubert1, P Martiat, C Dowding, N Ifrah, J M Goldman.   

Abstract

It has been reported that patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with 5' breakpoints within the major breakpoint cluster region (M-BCR) of the BCR gene have somewhat better prognoses than those with 3' breakpoints. We studied the position of the breakpoint in 67 patients with CML in chronic phase using conventional Southern blotting. Using restriction enzymes BglII, BamHI and HindIII and two genomic probes, a 0.6 kb (3' M-BCR) probe hybridizing to a part of the intron between exons b3 and b4 and a 2.0 kb (5' M-BCR) probe hybridizing to sequences including exon b1, we localized the breakpoint in M-BCR as occurring 5' (n = 38) or 3' (n = 28) of the HindIII restriction site located just downstream of exon b3. We failed to localize the breakpoint in one patient. The median durations of chronic phase (37 versus 44 months respectively) and of survival (50 versus 51 months respectively) for patients with 5' and 3' breakpoints were not significantly different. When we analysed only patients whose DNA was collected within 4 weeks of diagnosis (5' breakpoints, n = 30; 3' breakpoints, n = 19), there was again no significant difference in duration of chronic phase or survival. The median survivals of patients divided into good, intermediate and poor prognosis categories in accordance with the prognostic index developed by Sokal and colleagues were 54, 50 and 26 months respectively. This study confirms the value of the Sokal prognostic index but provides no support for the notion that the precise genomic position of the breakpoint in M-BCR correlates with prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2310695     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1990.tb02534.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  5 in total

1.  Distinct characteristics of e13a2 versus e14a2 BCR-ABL1 driven chronic myeloid leukemia under first-line therapy with imatinib.

Authors:  Benjamin Hanfstein; Michael Lauseker; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Susanne Saussele; Philipp Erben; Christian Dietz; Alice Fabarius; Ulrike Proetel; Susanne Schnittger; Claudia Haferlach; Stefan W Krause; Jörg Schubert; Hermann Einsele; Mathias Hänel; Jolanta Dengler; Christiane Falge; Lothar Kanz; Andreas Neubauer; Michael Kneba; Frank Stegelmann; Michael Pfreundschuh; Cornelius F Waller; Karsten Spiekermann; Gabriela M Baerlocher; Markus Pfirrmann; Joerg Hasford; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Andreas Hochhaus; Martin C Müller
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Chronic myeloid leukemia patients with the e13a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript have inferior responses to imatinib compared to patients with the e14a2 transcript.

Authors:  Claire M Lucas; Robert J Harris; Athina Giannoudis; Andrea Davies; Katy Knight; Sarah J Watmough; Lihui Wang; Richard E Clark
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Confirmation and improvement of Sokal's prognostic classification of Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia: the value of early evaluation of the course of the disease. The Italian Cooperative Study Group on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.673

4.  Analysis of the clinico-hematological relevance of the breakpoint location within M-BCR in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ayda Bennour; Ines Ouahchi; Bechir Achour; Monia Zaier; Yosra Ben Youssef; Abderrahim Khelif; Ali Saad; Halima Sennana
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  The second Bagshawe lecture. Matching basic research to the management of cancer: the view from the other side of the fence.

Authors:  J A Wyke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.