Literature DB >> 23106804

Object permanence in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and gray wolves (Canis lupus).

Sylvain Fiset1, Vickie Plourde.   

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that phylogenetic constraints exerted on dogs by the process of domestication have altered the ability of dogs to represent the physical world and the displacement of objects. In this study, invisible (Experiment 1) and visible (Experiment 2) displacement problems were administered to determine whether domestic dogs' and gray wolves' cognitive capacities to infer the position of a hidden object differ. The results revealed that adult dogs and wolves performed similarly in searching for disappearing objects: Both species succeeded the visible displacement tasks but failed the invisible displacement problems. We conclude that physical cognition for finding hidden objects in domestic dogs and gray wolves is alike and unrelated to the process of domestication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106804     DOI: 10.1037/a0030595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  12 in total

1.  Trialling Meta-Research in Comparative Cognition: Claims and Statistical Inference in Animal Physical Cognition.

Authors:  Benjamin G Farrar; Drew M Altschul; Julia Fischer; Jolene van der Mescht; Sarah Placì; Camille A Troisi; Alizée Vernouillet; Nicola S Clayton; Ljerka Ostojić
Journal:  Anim Behav Cogn       Date:  2020-08

2.  The use of a displacement device negatively affects the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) in visible object displacement tasks.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Stefanie Riemer; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Wolves are better imitators of conspecifics than dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Inhibitory Control, but Not Prolonged Object-Related Experience Appears to Affect Physical Problem-Solving Performance of Pet Dogs.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Stefanie Riemer; Zsófia Virányi; Ludwig Huber; Friederike Range
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A comparison between wolves, Canis lupus, and dogs, Canis familiaris, in showing behaviour towards humans.

Authors:  Marianne T E Heberlein; Dennis C Turner; Friederike Range; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Measures of Dogs' Inhibitory Control Abilities Do Not Correlate across Tasks.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Lisa Jessica Wallis; Ludwig Huber; Friederike Range
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-24

7.  Where's the cookie? The ability of monkeys to track object transpositions.

Authors:  Katarzyna Majecka; Dariusz Pietraszewski
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Social learning from humans or conspecifics: differences and similarities between wolves and dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-03

Review 9.  Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.

Authors:  Amalia P M Bastos; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 10.  In what sense are dogs special? Canine cognition in comparative context.

Authors:  Stephen E G Lea; Britta Osthaus
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.