Literature DB >> 23106791

In vitro diagnostic assays are effective during the acute phase of delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions.

M E Polak1, G Belgi, C McGuire, C Pickard, E Healy, P S Friedmann, M R Ardern-Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have suggested that drug-specific lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPA) can be used retrospectively to confirm the culprit drug following delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR). However, only limited evidence supports their use in aiding acute clinical management. The aim of this study was to compare the LPA against combination cytokine assays for potential use in the acute setting.
METHODS: A total of 43 patients with DHR (19 during the acute reaction, 20 after recovery, four during acute and after recovery) and 14 control subjects without DHR were investigated using ex vivo analysis of drug-specific proliferation, and interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-4 production.
RESULTS: Healthy controls showed negative drug-specific proliferation and cytokine release in contrast to individuals with a known sensitivity (P < 0·0001). The assays demonstrated a test specificity of 95% (LPA), 83% (IFN-γ) and 92% (IL-4). The sensitivity of combined measurement of drug-specific IFN-γ and IL-4 cytokines during acute DHR was better than LPA (82% vs. 50%), but all assays were less sensitive during the recovery phase. The correlation between LPA and IFN-γ assays was strong (r = 0·7, P < 0·0001), whereas the IL-4 assay did not correlate as well with either of these assays. In contrast to LPA, drug enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays showed positive responses in patients concurrently taking immunosuppressive medication.
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro assays of drug-specific IFN-γ and IL-4 production offer potential for use as rapid diagnostic tests. Cytokine detection offers distinct advantages over the LPA, including a shorter assay time, a greater sensitivity and effectiveness in testing immunosuppressed patients.
© 2012 The Authors. BJD © 2012 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23106791     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  15 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the understanding of severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

Authors:  N R Adler; A K Aung; E N Ergen; J Trubiano; M S Y Goh; E J Phillips
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 2.  Non-immediate Cutaneous Reactions to Beta-Lactams: Approach to Diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonino Romano; Rocco Luigi Valluzzi; Cristiano Caruso; Michela Maggioletti; Francesco Gaeta
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.919

Review 3.  Cellular in vitro diagnosis of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Christian Möbs; Wolfgang Pfützner
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2014-08-07

Review 4.  Toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Authors:  Wolfram Hoetzenecker; Tarun Mehra; Ieva Saulite; Martin Glatz; Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier; Emmanuella Guenova; Antonio Cozzio; Lars E French
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-05-20

Review 5.  Drug induced exfoliative dermatitis: state of the art.

Authors:  Mona-Rita Yacoub; Alvise Berti; Corrado Campochiaro; Enrico Tombetti; Giuseppe Alvise Ramirez; Andrea Nico; Elisabetta Di Leo; Paola Fantini; Maria Grazia Sabbadini; Eustachio Nettis; Giselda Colombo
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2016-08-22

6.  In Vitro Assays in Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: Are They Still Research Tools or Diagnostic Tests Already?

Authors:  Grzegorz Porebski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  The Value of In Vitro Tests to DiminishDrug Challenges.

Authors:  Cristobalina Mayorga; Inmaculada Doña; Ezequiel Perez-Inestrosa; Tahia D Fernández; Maria J Torres
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Antibiotic Allergy.

Authors:  Inmaculada Doña; Maria J Torres; Maria I Montañez; Tahia D Fernández
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.764

Review 9.  Adverse cutaneous drug eruptions: current understanding.

Authors:  W Hoetzenecker; M Nägeli; E T Mehra; A N Jensen; I Saulite; P Schmid-Grendelmeier; E Guenova; A Cozzio; L E French
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.759

Review 10.  Pathogenesis and diagnosis of delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions, from bedside to bench and back.

Authors:  Rik Schrijvers; Liesbeth Gilissen; Anca Mirela Chiriac; Pascal Demoly
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.