Literature DB >> 23106751

Protection, participation and protection through participation: young people with intellectual disabilities and decision making in the family context.

R Saaltink1, G MacKinnon, F Owen, C Tardif-Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) are expected to be more compliant than persons without disabilities and that expectations for compliance begin in childhood. No study, however, seems yet to have included a primary focus on the participatory rights, or rights to express opinions, desires and preferences and to be heard and taken seriously in decision making among young people with ID who are not yet considered legally adult. The purpose of the two current studies was to explore how the right to participation is negotiated for young people with ID in a family context and to determine family members' recommendations for strategies to facilitate the participation of young people with ID.
METHOD: In the first study, four young people with ID, their mothers and two siblings from four families took part in semi-structured interviews about decision making in the family context. In the second study, a mother and daughter from the first study discussed and developed strategies to promote participation for young people with ID.
RESULTS: In the first study, all participants communicated that young people with ID follow an age-typical yet restricted pattern of participation in decisions about their lives. Young people's participation was consistently framed by familial norms and values as well as their families' desire to protect them. In the second study, both participants suggested communication about the outcomes of real or imagined decisions would help young family members rehearse decision-making strategies that would facilitate their autonomy while remaining within the bounds of familial norms, values and perceptions of safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Although young people with ID may make fewer independent decisions about their lives than typically developing peers, support in decision making can enable both increased protection and independence.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106751     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01649.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res        ISSN: 0964-2633


  5 in total

1.  Is Safety in the Eye of the Beholder? Safeguards in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Nicole E Conroy; Carolyn I Kim; Emily J LoBraico; Ellis M Prather; Robert S Olick
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Perceptions and understandings of self-determination in the context of relationships between people with intellectual disabilities and social care professionals.

Authors:  Carla Vaucher; Annick Cudré-Mauroux; Geneviève Piérart
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-06-17

Review 3.  Impact of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (UN-CRPD) on mental health care research - a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Steinert; Tilman Steinert; Erich Flammer; Susanne Jaeger
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  The Nature of Patient- and Family-Centred Care for Young Adults Living with Chronic Disease and their Family Members: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Allen; Nerina Scarinci; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  A REDCap-based model for online interventional research: Parent sleep education in autism.

Authors:  Beth A Malow; Anjalee Galion; Frances Lu; Nan Kennedy; Colleen E Lawrence; Alison Tassone; Lindsay O'Neal; Travis M Wilson; Robert A Parker; Paul A Harris; Ann M Neumeyer
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-06-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.