Literature DB >> 23106720

Partitioning the effects of spatial isolation, nest habitat, and individual diet in causing assortative mating within a population of threespine stickleback.

L K Snowberg1, D I Bolnick.   

Abstract

Assortative mating is measured as a phenotypic or genotypic correlation between mates. Although biologists typically view assortative mating in terms of mate preference for similar partners, correlations between mates can also arise from phenotypic spatial structure arising from spatial isolation or habitat preferences. Here, we test whether diet-assortative mating within an ecologically variable population of threespine stickleback results from small-scale geographic isolation or microhabitat preference. We find evidence for assortative mating in the form of a positive correlation between mated pairs' diets (measured using stable isotopes). Stable isotopes reveal diet differences between different nesting areas and among individuals using different nest habitat within a nesting area. This spatial segregation of diet types should generate some assortative mating, but is insufficient to explain the observed assortment strength. Significant male-female isotope correlations remain after controlling for spatial variables. We therefore conclude that sticklebacks' diet-assortative mating arises from additional behavioral preference. More generally, our results illustrate the point that spatial segregation can only drive appreciable levels of phenotypic assortative mating when environment-phenotype correlations are parallel and strong in both sexes. Consequently, intraspecific assortative mating may typically entail mating preferences rather than just spatial cosegregation of phenotypes.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106720      PMCID: PMC3869085          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01701.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  24 in total

1.  Evidence for ecology's role in speciation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; Seiichi Mori; Benjamin K Blackman; Lior David; David M Kingsley; Leia Jamieson; Jennifer Chou; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Testing for mating isolation between ecotypes: laboratory experiments with lake, stream and hybrid stickleback.

Authors:  J A M Raeymaekers; M Boisjoly; L Delaire; D Berner; K Räsänen; A P Hendry
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments.

Authors:  Timothy H Vines; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Systems of Mating. III. Assortative Mating Based on Somatic Resemblance.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1921-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks.

Authors:  D Schluter; J D McPhail
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Phenotype-dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Lisa K Snowberg; Claire Patenia; William E Stutz; Travis Ingram; On Lee Lau
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology.

Authors:  Pim Edelaar; Adam M Siepielski; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Network analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individual vs. population diets.

Authors:  Márcio S Araújo; Paulo R Guimarães; Richard Svanbäck; Aluisio Pinheiro; Paulo Guimarães; Sérgio F Dos Reis; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Megan L Head; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Specialized Feeding Behavior Influences Both Ecological Specialization and Assortative Mating in Sympatric Host Races of Pea Aphids.

Authors:  Marina C Caillaud; Sara Via
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  7 in total

1.  Diet-based assortative mating through sexual imprinting.

Authors:  Emily K Delaney; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Nest-site selection in a fish species with paternal care.

Authors:  Theo C M Bakker; Beat Mundwiler
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Lack of evolution in a leaf beetle that lives on two contrasting host plants.

Authors:  Katherine Gould; Paul Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Widespread positive but weak assortative mating by diet within stickleback populations.

Authors:  Travis Ingram; Yuexin Jiang; Racine Rangel; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Individual diet has sex-dependent effects on vertebrate gut microbiota.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Lisa K Snowberg; Philipp E Hirsch; Christian L Lauber; Elin Org; Brian Parks; Aldons J Lusis; Rob Knight; J Gregory Caporaso; Richard Svanbäck
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Learning to speciate: The biased learning of mate preferences promotes adaptive radiation.

Authors:  R Tucker Gilman; Genevieve M Kozak
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Opsin expression predicts male nuptial color in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Chad D Brock; Diana Rennison; Thor Veen; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.