Literature DB >> 23106163

Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?

Sey Kiat Lim1, Kwang Hyun Kim, Tae-Young Shin, Koon Ho Rha.   

Abstract

The aim was to review the current status and evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in comparison with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Between January 2008 and June 2012, published English language comparative studies comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with either open radical prostatectomy and/or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were reviewed. End-points for this review include oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes, and complications. Compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and/or open radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offered at least equivalent oncological control. Current evidence seems to suggest a superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy over open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in terms of functional outcomes, such as urinary continence and potency. Risks of perioperative complications were also low after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers at least equivalent oncological and functional outcomes with low risks of complications when compared with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. However, there is a paucity of high-level evidence available in current literature.
© 2012 The Japanese Urological Association.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106163     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  11 in total

Review 1.  Controversies associated with the evaluation of elderly men with localized prostate cancer when considering radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Koji Mitsuzuka; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeroen Heemskerk; Nicole D Bouvy; Cor G M I Baeten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Abdurrahman İnkaya; Ahmet Tahra; Resul Sobay; Ali Kumcu; Eyüp Veli Küçük; Uğur Boylu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-01

Review 5.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Wu Pan; Xin-Ming Cui; Jing-Fei Teng; Dong-Xu Zhang; Zhi-Jun Wang; Fa-Jun Qu; Yi Gao; Xin-Gang Cui; Dan-Feng Xu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Body mass index as a classifier to predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with lower prostate-specific antigen levels.

Authors:  Keisuke Goto; Hirotaka Nagamatsu; Jun Teishima; Yuki Kohada; Shinsuke Fujii; Yoshimasa Kurimura; Koji Mita; Masanobu Shigeta; Satoshi Maruyama; Yoji Inoue; Mitsuru Nakahara; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-10

7.  The comparison of transurethral versus suprapubic catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ze'an Li; Kaiwen Li; Wanhua Wu; Qiong Wang; Xiaoming Ma; Chunhao Lin; Shengmeng Peng; Yiming Lai; Fen Wang; Hai Huang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-10

8.  Robot-assisted versus other types of radical prostatectomy: population-based safety and cost comparison in Japan, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Hiroki Matsui; Tetsuya Fujimura; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Haruki Kume; Yu Changhong; Michael W Kattan; Kiyohide Fushimi; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 9.  Prostate cancer in East Asia: evolving trend over the last decade.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Hong-Kai Wang; Yuan-Yuan Qu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Short interval of biopsy to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not render any adverse effects on the perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Minke He; Yaohui Li; Zhuoyi Xiang; Li-An Sun; Yanjun Zhu; Xiaoyi Hu; Jianming Guo; Hang Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.