Literature DB >> 23104906

Ablation of multi-wavelet re-entry: general principles and in silico analyses.

Peter S Spector1, Daniel D Correa de Sa, Ethan S Tischler, Nathaniel C Thompson, Nicole Habel, Justin Stinnett-Donnelly, Bryce E Benson, Philipp Bielau, Jason H T Bates.   

Abstract

AIMS: Catheter ablation strategies for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias are quite successful when targeting spatially constrained substrates. Complex, dynamic, and spatially varying substrates, however, pose a significant challenge for ablation, which delivers spatially fixed lesions. We describe tissue excitation using concepts of surface topology which provides a framework for addressing this challenge. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of mechanism-based ablation strategies in the setting of complex dynamic substrates. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used a computational model of propagation through electrically excitable tissue to test the effects of ablation on excitation patterns of progressively greater complexity, from fixed rotors to multi-wavelet re-entry. Our results indicate that (i) focal ablation at a spiral-wave core does not result in termination; (ii) termination requires linear lesions from the tissue edge to the spiral-wave core; (iii) meandering spiral-waves terminate upon collision with a boundary (linear lesion or tissue edge); (iv) the probability of terminating multi-wavelet re-entry is proportional to the ratio of total boundary length to tissue area; (v) the efficacy of linear lesions varies directly with the regional density of spiral-waves.
CONCLUSION: We establish a theoretical framework for re-entrant arrhythmias that explains the requirements for their successful treatment. We demonstrate the inadequacy of focal ablation for spatially fixed spiral-waves. Mechanistically guided principles for ablating multi-wavelet re-entry are provided. The potential to capitalize upon regional heterogeneity of spiral-wave density for improved ablation efficacy is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23104906     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

Review 1.  Lessons from computer simulations of ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vincent Jacquemet
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Mapping atrial fibrillation : An overview of potential mechanisms underlying atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Christopher Kowalewski
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Re-evaluating the multiple wavelet hypothesis for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Prasanth Ganesan; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Effects of Heterogeneous Diffuse Fibrosis on Arrhythmia Dynamics and Mechanism.

Authors:  Ivan V Kazbanov; Kirsten H W J ten Tusscher; Alexander V Panfilov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Competitive Drivers of Atrial Fibrillation: The Interplay Between Focal Drivers and Multiwavelet Reentry.

Authors:  Richard T Carrick; Bryce E Benson; Oliver R J Bates; Peter S Spector
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  Identifying Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms for Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Brototo Deb; Prasanth Ganesan; Ruibin Feng; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Prospectively quantifying the propensity for atrial fibrillation: a mechanistic formulation.

Authors:  Richard T Carrick; Oliver R J Bates; Bryce E Benson; Nicole Habel; Jason H T Bates; Peter S Spector
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Size matters in atrial fibrillation: the underestimated importance of reduction of contiguous electrical mass underlying the effectiveness of catheter ablation.

Authors:  Adam Hartley; Joseph Shalhoub; Fu Siong Ng; Andrew D Krahn; Zachary Laksman; Jason G Andrade; Marc W Deyell; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Markus B Sikkel
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.214

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.