Literature DB >> 23104815

The Open Perimetry Interface: an enabling tool for clinical visual psychophysics.

Andrew Turpin1, Paul H Artes, Allison M McKendrick.   

Abstract

Perimeters are commercially available instruments for measuring various attributes of the visual field in a clinical setting. They have several advantages over traditional lab-based systems for conducting vision experiments, including built-in gaze tracking and calibration, polished appearance, and attributes to increase participant comfort. Prior to this work, there was no standard to control such instruments, making it difficult and time consuming to use them for novel psychophysical experiments. This paper introduces the Open Perimetry Interface (OPI), a standard set of functions that can be used to control perimeters. Currently the standard is partially implemented in the open-source programming language R on two commercially available instruments: the Octopus 900 (a projection-based bowl perimeter produced by Haag-Streit, Switzerland) and the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (a CRT-based system produced by Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), allowing these instruments to be used as a platform for psychophysical experimentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23104815     DOI: 10.1167/12.11.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  23 in total

1.  The visualFields package: a tool for analysis and visualization of visual fields.

Authors:  Iván Marín-Franch; William H Swanson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Robot Assistants for Perimetry: A Study of Patient Experience and Performance.

Authors:  Allison M McKendrick; Astrid Zeman; Ping Liu; Dilek Aktepe; Illham Aden; Daisy Bhagat; Kieren Do; Huy D Nguyen; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Improving Visual Field Examination of the Macula Using Structural Information.

Authors:  Giovanni Montesano; Luca M Rossetti; Davide Allegrini; Mario R Romano; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  The Effect of Stimulus Size on the Reliable Stimulus Range of Perimetry.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; William H Swanson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Effect of Restricting Perimetry Testing Algorithms to Reliable Sensitivities on Test-Retest Variability.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Spatial summation across the visual field in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Shindy Je; Fergal A Ennis; J Margaret Woodhouse; Frank Sengpiel; Tony Redmond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Jonathan S Myers; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Sequentially optimized reconstruction strategy: A meta-strategy for perimetry testing.

Authors:  Şerife Seda Kucur; Raphael Sznitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers.

Authors:  Luke X Chong; Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.