OBJECTIVES: Occupational exposure to chlorinated aliphatic solvents has been associated with an increased cancer risk, including brain cancer. However, many of these solvents remain in active, large-volume use. We evaluated glioma risk from non-farm occupational exposure (ever/never and estimated cumulative exposure) to any of the six chlorinated solvents--carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene or 1,1,1--trichloroethane-among 798 cases and 1175 population-based controls, aged 18-80 years and non-metropolitan residents of Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Methods Solvent use was estimated based on occupation, industry and era, using a bibliographic database of published exposure levels and exposure determinants. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate ORs adjusted for frequency matching variables age group and sex, and age and education. Additional analyses were limited to 904 participants who donated blood specimens (excluding controls reporting a previous diagnosis of cancer) genotyped for glutathione-S-transferases GSTP1, GSTM3 and GSTT1. Individuals with functional GST genes might convert chlorinated solvents crossing the blood-brain barrier into cytotoxic metabolites. RESULTS: Both estimated cumulative exposure (ppm-years) and ever exposure to chlorinated solvents were associated with decreased glioma risk and were statistically significant overall and for women. In analyses comparing participants with a high probability of exposure with the unexposed, no associations were statistically significant. Solvent-exposed participants with functional GST genes were not at increased risk of glioma. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no associations of glioma risk and chlorinated solvent exposure. Large pooled studies are needed to explore the interaction of genetic pathways and environmental and occupational exposures in glioma aetiology.
OBJECTIVES: Occupational exposure to chlorinated aliphatic solvents has been associated with an increased cancer risk, including brain cancer. However, many of these solvents remain in active, large-volume use. We evaluated glioma risk from non-farm occupational exposure (ever/never and estimated cumulative exposure) to any of the six chlorinated solvents--carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene or 1,1,1--trichloroethane-among 798 cases and 1175 population-based controls, aged 18-80 years and non-metropolitan residents of Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Methods Solvent use was estimated based on occupation, industry and era, using a bibliographic database of published exposure levels and exposure determinants. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate ORs adjusted for frequency matching variables age group and sex, and age and education. Additional analyses were limited to 904 participants who donated blood specimens (excluding controls reporting a previous diagnosis of cancer) genotyped for glutathione-S-transferases GSTP1, GSTM3 and GSTT1. Individuals with functional GST genes might convert chlorinated solvents crossing the blood-brain barrier into cytotoxic metabolites. RESULTS: Both estimated cumulative exposure (ppm-years) and ever exposure to chlorinated solvents were associated with decreased glioma risk and were statistically significant overall and for women. In analyses comparing participants with a high probability of exposure with the unexposed, no associations were statistically significant. Solvent-exposed participants with functional GST genes were not at increased risk of glioma. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no associations of glioma risk and chlorinated solvent exposure. Large pooled studies are needed to explore the interaction of genetic pathways and environmental and occupational exposures in glioma aetiology.
Authors: T L Thomas; P A Stewart; A Stemhagen; P Correa; S A Norman; M L Bleecker; R N Hoover Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 1987-10 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B Hopf; Jane C Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M DeMarini; Bruce A Fowler; Bernard D Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien M McElvenny; Hartwig Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M Ruder; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra Silverman; Martyn T Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G Stevens; Paolo Vineis; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Lauren Zeise; Vincent J Cogliano Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Margaret Wrensch; Karl T Kelsey; Mei Liu; Rei Miike; Michelle Moghadassi; Kenneth Aldape; Alex McMillan; John K Wiencke Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anneclaire J De Roos; Nat Rothman; Peter D Inskip; Martha S Linet; William R Shapiro; Robert G Selker; Howard A Fine; Peter M Black; Gary S Pittman; Douglas A Bell Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Luc Bauchet; Faith G Davis; Isabelle Deltour; James L Fisher; Chelsea Eastman Langer; Melike Pekmezci; Judith A Schwartzbaum; Michelle C Turner; Kyle M Walsh; Margaret R Wrensch; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Geza Benke; Michelle C Turner; Sarah Fleming; Jordi Figuerola; Laurel Kincl; Lesley Richardson; Maria Blettner; Martine Hours; Daniel Krewski; David McLean; Marie-Elise Parent; Siegal Sadetzki; Klaus Schlaefer; Brigitte Schlehofer; Jack Siemiatycki; Martie van Tongeren; Elisabeth Cardis Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kathryn Z Guyton; Karen A Hogan; Cheryl Siegel Scott; Glinda S Cooper; Ambuja S Bale; Leonid Kopylev; Stanley Barone; Susan L Makris; Barbara Glenn; Ravi P Subramaniam; Maureen R Gwinn; Rebecca C Dzubow; Weihsueh A Chiu Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Marija G Matic; Vesna M Coric; Ana R Savic-Radojevic; Petar V Bulat; Marija S Pljesa-Ercegovac; Dejan P Dragicevic; Tatjana I Djukic; Tatjana P Simic; Tatjana D Pekmezovic Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240