BACKGROUND: Although postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) halves the 10-year recurrence rate in breast cancer patients through all age groups, the question of whether RT may be omitted and replaced by endocrine therapy for women aged 70 years and older with low-risk factors has recently become an issue of debate. METHODS: Survey of the relevant recent literature (Medline) and international guidelines. RESULTS: Three randomized studies investigating the effect of RT in older women revealed significantly increased local recurrence rates when RT was omitted, and a negative impact on disease-free survival was observed in two of these trials. Despite these findings, in one of the studies omission of RT in women over 70 is recommended, leading to a respective amendment in the guidelines of the American National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Several large retrospective cohort studies analyzing the outcome of patients over 65 years with and without RT have since been published and showed a significantly improved local control in all subgroups of advanced age and stage, which predominantly translated into improved disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: No subgroup of elderly patients has yet been identified that did not profit from RT in terms of local control. Therefore, chronological age alone is not an appropriate criterion for deciding against or in favor of adjuvant RT. The DEGRO breast cancer expert panel explicitly discourages determination of a certain age for the omission of postoperative RT in healthy elderly women with low-risk breast cancer. For frail elderly women, treatment decisions should be individually decided on the basis of standardized geriatric assessment.
BACKGROUND: Although postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) halves the 10-year recurrence rate in breast cancerpatients through all age groups, the question of whether RT may be omitted and replaced by endocrine therapy for women aged 70 years and older with low-risk factors has recently become an issue of debate. METHODS: Survey of the relevant recent literature (Medline) and international guidelines. RESULTS: Three randomized studies investigating the effect of RT in older women revealed significantly increased local recurrence rates when RT was omitted, and a negative impact on disease-free survival was observed in two of these trials. Despite these findings, in one of the studies omission of RT in women over 70 is recommended, leading to a respective amendment in the guidelines of the American National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Several large retrospective cohort studies analyzing the outcome of patients over 65 years with and without RT have since been published and showed a significantly improved local control in all subgroups of advanced age and stage, which predominantly translated into improved disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: No subgroup of elderly patients has yet been identified that did not profit from RT in terms of local control. Therefore, chronological age alone is not an appropriate criterion for deciding against or in favor of adjuvant RT. The DEGRO breast cancer expert panel explicitly discourages determination of a certain age for the omission of postoperative RT in healthy elderly women with low-risk breast cancer. For frail elderly women, treatment decisions should be individually decided on the basis of standardized geriatric assessment.
Authors: Hyman B Muss; Dongsheng Tu; James N Ingle; Silvana Martino; Nicholas J Robert; Joseph L Pater; Timothy J Whelan; Michael J Palmer; Martine J Piccart; Lois E Shepherd; Kathleen I Pritchard; Zhi He; Paul E Goss Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K Hancke; M D Denkinger; J König; C Kurzeder; A Wöckel; D Herr; M Blettner; R Kreienberg Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S Darby; P McGale; C Correa; C Taylor; R Arriagada; M Clarke; D Cutter; C Davies; M Ewertz; J Godwin; R Gray; L Pierce; T Whelan; Y Wang; R Peto Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Linthorst; A N van Geel; E A Baartman; S B Oei; W Ghidey; G C van Rhoon; J van der Zee Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Wolfgang Harms; Andreas Geretschläger; Corinne Cescato; Martin Buess; Dieter Köberle; Branca Asadpour Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Frederik Wenz; Elena Sperk; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Marc D Piroth; Marie-Luise Sautter-Bihl; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Christoph Fussl; Rolf Sauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: F Sedlmayer; M-L Sautter-Bihl; W Budach; J Dunst; G Fastner; P Feyer; R Fietkau; W Haase; W Harms; R Souchon; F Wenz; R Sauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Chandler Scott Cortina; Ashley A Woodfin; Laurel L Tangalakis; Xuanji Wang; Jennifer D Son; Jennifer Poirier; Ruta Rao; Katherine Kopkash; Andrea Madrigrano Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 2.268
Authors: Wolfgang Harms; W Budach; J Dunst; P Feyer; R Fietkau; W Haase; D Krug; M D Piroth; M-L Sautter-Bihl; F Sedlmayer; R Souchon; F Wenz; R Sauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 3.621