Literature DB >> 23104505

Serum α1β-glycoprotein and afamin ratio as potential diagnostic and prognostic markers in cholangiocarcinoma.

Arthit Tolek1, Chaisiri Wongkham, Siriporn Proungvitaya, Atit Silsirivanit, Sittiruk Roytrakul, Narong Khuntikeo, Sopit Wongkham.   

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) affects the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts and is commonly burdened by a late presentation and resulting high mortality rate. Accordingly, finding non-invasive biomarkers with adequate diagnostic/prognostic values is a priority in high-risk populations. In this study, we analyzed proteomes of serum samples from six CCA cases and ten healthy subjects using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to identify CCA-associated spots. Thirty-six CCA-associated proteins found in sera were identified by mass spectrometry. α1β-Glycoprotein (A1BG) and afamin (AFM) were detected consistently at different degrees in CCA sera compared with controls and were validated for their diagnostic and prognostic potential in a larger cohort of 64 patients with CCA, 4 with benign biliary diseases and 20 healthy subjects and compared between pre- and postsurgery serum samples from 26 CCA patients to ascertain a prognostic correlation. A single blot test developed to assess the serum A1BG/AFM ratio could detect CCA cases with 87.5% specificity, 84.4% sensitivity and the levels were significantly higher in CCA compared with controls. A high level of postoperative serum A1BG/AFM ratio was associated with worse outcomes and the infiltration of resection margins. The A1BG/AFM ratio may constitute a novel non-invasive candidate marker to diagnose CCA and its outcomes with high specificity and sensitivity. Prospective studies are awaited to demonstrate the clinical value of this observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23104505     DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2012.012215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)        ISSN: 1535-3699


  7 in total

1.  Serum and biliary MMP-9 and TIMP-1 concentrations in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ali Tüzün İnce; Kemal Yıldız; Venkatanarayana Gangarapu; Yusuf Kayar; Birol Baysal; Oğuzhan Karatepe; Ahu Sarbay Kemik; Hakan Şentürk
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 2.  Molecular diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Haga; Tushar Patel
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 3.  Cancer biomarker discovery for cholangiocarcinoma: the high-throughput approaches.

Authors:  Atit Silsirivanit; Kanlayanee Sawanyawisuth; Gregory J Riggins; Chaisiri Wongkham
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 7.027

4.  A new clinically based staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Roongruedee Chaiteerakij; William S Harmsen; Carlos Romero Marrero; Mohammed M Aboelsoud; Albert Ndzengue; Joseph Kaiya; Terry M Therneau; William Sanchez; Gregory J Gores; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gyem Tshering; Palden Wangyel Dorji; Wanna Chaijaroenkul; Kesara Na-Bangchang
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Diagnostic and prognostic serum marker of cholangiocarcinoma (Review).

Authors:  Xiaojun Zeng; Hualin Tao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  O-GlcNAcylation mediates metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma through FOXO3 and MAN1A1.

Authors:  Chatchai Phoomak; Atit Silsirivanit; Dayoung Park; Kanlayanee Sawanyawisuth; Kulthida Vaeteewoottacharn; Chaisiri Wongkham; Eric W-F Lam; Chawalit Pairojkul; Carlito B Lebrilla; Sopit Wongkham
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 9.867

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.