BACKGROUND: Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia surgery is associated with little postoperative pain and a fast recovery, but is a technically demanding operative procedure. Apart from the surgeon's expertise, patient characteristics and hernia-related variations may also affect the operative time and outcome. METHODS: Patient-related factors predictive of perioperative complications, conversion to open anterior repair, and operative time were studied in a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TEP hernia repair from 2005 to 2009. RESULTS: A total of 3,432 patients underwent TEP. The mean operative time was 26 min (SD ± 10.9), TEP was converted into an open anterior approach in 26 patients (0.8 %), and perioperative complications were observed in 55 (1.6 %) patients. Multivariable regression analysis showed that a history of abdominal surgery (OR 1.76, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.01-3.06; p = 0.05), and the presence of a scrotal (OR 5.31, 1.20-23.43; p = 0.03) or bilateral hernia (OR 2.25, 1.25-4.06; p = 0.01) were independent predictive factors of perioperative complications. Female gender (OR 5.30. 1.52-18.45; p = 0.01), a history of abdominal surgery (OR 3.96, 1.72- 9.12; p = 0.001), and the presence of a scrotal hernia (OR 34.84, 10.42-116.51, p < 0.001) were predictive factors for conversion. A BMI ≥ 25 (effect size (ES) 1.78, 95 % confidence interval 1.09-2.47; p < 0.001) and the presence of a scrotal (ES 5.81, 1.93-9.68; p = 0.003), indirect (ES 2.78, 2.05- 3.50, p < 0.001) or bilateral hernia (ES 10.19, 9.20-11.08; p < 0.001) were associated with a longer operative time. CONCLUSION: Certain patient characteristics are, even in experienced TEP surgeons, associated with an increased risk of conversion and complications and a longer operative time. For the surgeon gaining experience with TEP, it seems advisable to select relatively young and slender male patients with a unilateral (non-scrotal) hernia and no previous abdominal surgery to enhance patient safety and 'surgeon comfort'.
BACKGROUND: Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia surgery is associated with little postoperative pain and a fast recovery, but is a technically demanding operative procedure. Apart from the surgeon's expertise, patient characteristics and hernia-related variations may also affect the operative time and outcome. METHODS:Patient-related factors predictive of perioperative complications, conversion to open anterior repair, and operative time were studied in a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TEPhernia repair from 2005 to 2009. RESULTS: A total of 3,432 patients underwent TEP. The mean operative time was 26 min (SD ± 10.9), TEP was converted into an open anterior approach in 26 patients (0.8 %), and perioperative complications were observed in 55 (1.6 %) patients. Multivariable regression analysis showed that a history of abdominal surgery (OR 1.76, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.01-3.06; p = 0.05), and the presence of a scrotal (OR 5.31, 1.20-23.43; p = 0.03) or bilateral hernia (OR 2.25, 1.25-4.06; p = 0.01) were independent predictive factors of perioperative complications. Female gender (OR 5.30. 1.52-18.45; p = 0.01), a history of abdominal surgery (OR 3.96, 1.72- 9.12; p = 0.001), and the presence of a scrotal hernia (OR 34.84, 10.42-116.51, p < 0.001) were predictive factors for conversion. A BMI ≥ 25 (effect size (ES) 1.78, 95 % confidence interval 1.09-2.47; p < 0.001) and the presence of a scrotal (ES 5.81, 1.93-9.68; p = 0.003), indirect (ES 2.78, 2.05- 3.50, p < 0.001) or bilateral hernia (ES 10.19, 9.20-11.08; p < 0.001) were associated with a longer operative time. CONCLUSION: Certain patient characteristics are, even in experienced TEP surgeons, associated with an increased risk of conversion and complications and a longer operative time. For the surgeon gaining experience with TEP, it seems advisable to select relatively young and slender male patients with a unilateral (non-scrotal) hernia and no previous abdominal surgery to enhance patient safety and 'surgeon comfort'.
Authors: N Schouten; R K J Simmermacher; T van Dalen; N Smakman; G J Clevers; P H P Davids; E J M M Verleisdonk; J P J Burgmans Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: A Eklund; C Rudberg; S Smedberg; L K Enander; C E Leijonmarck; J Osterberg; A Montgomery Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez Journal: Hernia Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: C E H Voorbrood; J P J Burgmans; G J Clevers; P H P Davids; E J M M Verleisdonk; T van Dalen Journal: Hernia Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 4.739