Literature DB >> 23104194

Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment for potential compressive effects of retained posterior longitudinal ligament after anterior cervical fusions: a cross-sectional study.

Kingsley R Chin1, Gary Ghiselli, Vanessa Cumming, Christopher G Furey, Jung U Yoo, Sanford E Emery.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE: To assess using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging whether the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) caused residual cord compression after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in a series of patients in whom the PLL was retained. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a lack of data evaluating the postoperative compressive effects of the PLL in patients undergoing ACDF providing guidance as to whether to remove or retain the PLL during discectomy to facilitate adequate decompression.
METHODS: Postoperative gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance images were reviewed in a series of 33 patients who underwent ACDF for cervical radiculomyelopathy and who had persistent or recurrent postoperative symptoms. Patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament or with a herniated disc behind the PLL were excluded from this study.
RESULTS: There were no cases of discernible compression by the retained PLL identified on the magnetic resonance image (P < 0.001) as assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Four patients underwent subsequent revision surgery unrelated to the PLL.
CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate magnetic resonance imaging evidence to suggest that the retained PLL caused compression after ACDF in this patient cohort. Therefore we suggest that removing the PLL should be considered for reasons other than concern about residual compression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23104194     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182796e9c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Major neurological deficit following anterior cervical decompression and fusion: what is the next step?

Authors:  Edward Bayley; Bronek M Boszczyk; Reuben Soh Chee Cheong; Abhishek Srivastava
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Decreasing radiation dose with FluoroLESS Standalone Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Kathleen A Quijada; Moawiah S Mustafa; Luai S Mustafa; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

3.  Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Jeremy Goodsitt; Gerard Carandang; Alexander J Ghanayem; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

4.  Sentinel sign in standalone anterior cervical fusion: Outcomes and fusion rate.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Luai M Mustafa; Moawiah M Mustafa; Amala Benny; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-24

5.  The Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Disc Replacement: An Ovine Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Cheng Yu; Ding-Jun Hao; Yu-Li Ma; Da-Geng Huang; Hou-Kun Li; Hang Feng; Qian Hou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-31

6.  Soft tissue swelling incidence using demineralized bone matrix in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Jason A Seale; Juan M Valdivia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-10-18

7.  Predictability of severity of disc degeneration and disc protrusion using horizontal displacement of cervical dynamic radiographs: A retrospective comparison study with MRI.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Kim; Jong Moon Hwang; Jin-Sung Park; Seungwoo Han; Donghwi Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.