Literature DB >> 23104191

Tensile failure properties of the perinatal, neonatal, and pediatric cadaveric cervical spine.

Jason F Luck1, Roger W Nightingale, Yin Song, Jason R Kait, Andre M Loyd, Barry S Myers, Cameron R Dale Bass.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanical tensile testing of perinatal, neonatal, and pediatric cadaveric cervical spines to failure.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the tensile failure properties of the cervical spine from birth to adulthood. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pediatric cervical spine biomechanical studies have been few due to the limited availability of pediatric cadavers. Therefore, scaled data based on human adult and juvenile animal studies have been used to augment the limited pediatric cadaver data. Despite these efforts, substantial uncertainty remains in our understanding of pediatric cervical spine biomechanics.
METHODS: A total of 24 cadaveric osteoligamentous head-neck complexes, 20 weeks gestation to 18 years, were sectioned into segments (occiput-C2 [O-C2], C4-C5, and C6-C7) and tested in tension to determine axial stiffness, displacement at failure, and load-to-failure.
RESULTS: Tensile stiffness-to-failure (N/mm) increased by age (O-C2: 23-fold, neonate: 22 ± 7, 18 yr: 504; C4-C5: 7-fold, neonate: 71 ± 14, 18 yr: 509; C6-C7: 7-fold, neonate: 64 ± 17, 18 yr: 456). Load-to-failure (N) increased by age (O-C2: 13-fold, neonate: 228 ± 40, 18 yr: 2888; C4-C5: 9-fold, neonate: 207 ± 63, 18 yr: 1831; C6-C7: 10-fold, neonate: 174 ± 41, 18 yr: 1720). Normalized displacement at failure (mm/mm) decreased by age (O-C2: 6-fold, neonate: 0.34 ± 0.076, 18 yr: 0.059; C4-C5: 3-fold, neonate: 0.092 ± 0.015, 18 yr: 0.035; C6-C7: 2-fold, neonate: 0.088 ± 0.019, 18 yr: 0.037).
CONCLUSION: Cervical spine tensile stiffness-to-failure and load-to-failure increased nonlinearly, whereas normalized displacement at failure decreased nonlinearly, from birth to adulthood. Pronounced ligamentous laxity observed at younger ages in the O-C2 segment quantitatively supports the prevalence of spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality in the pediatric population. This study provides important and previously unavailable data for validating pediatric cervical spine models, for evaluating current scaling techniques and animal surrogate models, and for the development of more biofidelic pediatric crash test dummies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23104191     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182793873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

Review 1.  Acquired pathology of the pediatric spine and spinal cord.

Authors:  Susan Palasis; Laura L Hayes
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-09-07

2.  The potential of spring distraction to dynamically correct complex spinal deformities in the growing child.

Authors:  Sebastiaan P J Wijdicks; Justin V C Lemans; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Herke Jan Noordmans; René M Castelein; Moyo C Kruyt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Anatomical and Physiological Differences between Children and Adults Relevant to Traumatic Brain Injury and the Implications for Clinical Assessment and Care.

Authors:  Anthony A Figaji
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Development and validation of a 10-year-old child ligamentous cervical spine finite element model.

Authors:  Liqiang Dong; Guangyao Li; Haojie Mao; Stanley Marek; King H Yang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.934

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.