| Literature DB >> 23103532 |
Hugo Palafox-Carlos1, Joana Gil-Chávez, Rogerio R Sotelo-Mundo, Jacek Namiesnik, Shela Gorinstein, Gustavo A González-Aguilar.
Abstract
Phenolic compounds are known to have antioxidant capacity; however, there is little information about molecular interactions between particular phenolics found in fruits at different developmental stages. Therefore, the total antioxidant capacity of the phenolic compounds of a fruit may not correspond to the sum of individual antioxidant capacity given by antioxidants from that tissue. In this study, individual antioxidant capacity and the interactions of four major phenolic compounds (chlorogenic, gallic, protocatechuic and vanillic acid) found in 'Ataulfo' mango pulp were tested using the DPPH assay. Significant synergism was found in the majority of the all combinations, as well as the combination of the four phenolics. However, antagonism was also observed between some molecules. This work demonstrated particular interactions that may occur in a complex environment within the complex framework of a natural food. The present results may also assist in the future design of functional foods or ingredients based on their antioxidant activity and their synergistic or antagonist interactions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23103532 PMCID: PMC6268240 DOI: 10.3390/molecules171112657
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Individual antioxidant capacity of phenolic acids at 0.2 mM. Gallic acid (A), chlorogenic acid (B), protocatechuic acid (C) and vanillic acid (D).
Figure 2Chemical structure of the compounds studied in this work.
Antioxidant capacity of mixtures containing two, three and four phenolic acids. (A) gallic acid, (B) protocatechuic acid, (C) chlorogenic acid, (D) vanillic acid.Different letter at each line indicates significant differences (p ≤ 0.05).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A | 30.47 ± 1.8 | |||
| B | 17.30 ± 1.3 | |||
| C | 13.56 ± 0.8 | |||
| D | 5.55 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| ||||
| AB | 67.58µ | 47.77µ | Synergic | |
| AC | 44.96µ | 44.03µ | Synergic | |
| BC | 34.83µ | 30.86µ | Synergic | |
| AD | 33.03µ | 36.02µ | Antagonist | |
| BD | 23.66µ | 22.85µ | ||
| CD | 20.46µ | 19.11µ | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A | 20.11 ± 1.3 | |||
| B | 11.42 ± 0.7 | |||
| C | 8.95 ± 0.4 | |||
| D | 3.66 ± 0.5 | |||
|
| ||||
| ACD | 58.10µ | 32.72µ | Synergic | |
| ABC | 43.03µ | 40.48µ | Synergic | |
| ABD | 42.52µ | 35.19µ | Synergic | |
| BCD | 19.70µ | 24.03µ | Antagonist | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A | 15.23 ± 1.1 | |||
| B | 8.65 ± 0.8 | |||
| C | 6.78 ± 0.6 | |||
| D | 2.77 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| ||||
| ABCD | 39.76µ | 33.44µ | Synergic |